Worker Beliefs about Outside Options
Simon Jäger, Christopher Roth, Nina Roussille, Benjamin Schoefer
Quarterly Journal of Economics,
No. 3,
2024
Abstract
Standard labor market models assume that workers hold accurate beliefs about the external wage distribution, and hence their outside options with other employers. We test this assumption by comparing German workers’ beliefs about outside options with objective benchmarks. First, we find that workers wrongly anchor their beliefs about outside options on their current wage: workers that would experience a 10% wage change if switching to their outside option only expect a 1% change. Second, workers in low-paying firms underestimate wages elsewhere. Third, in response to information about the wages of similar workers, respondents correct their beliefs about their outside options and change their job search and wage negotiation intentions. Finally, we analyze the consequences of anchoring in a simple equilibrium model. In the model, anchored beliefs keep overly pessimistic workers stuck in low-wage jobs, which gives rise to monopsony power and labor market segmentation.
Read article
23.05.2024 • 15/2024
Veranstaltungshinweis: „Europas Populisten im Aufwind: Ökonomische Ursachen und demokratische Herausforderungen“
Kurz vor der Europawahl diskutieren Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler am 3. Juni 2024 ab 18 Uhr an der Leopoldina in Halle (Saale) über den Aufschwung populistischer Parteien in Europa, dessen ökonomische Ursachen und die damit verbundenen demokratischen Herausforderungen.
Read
27.02.2024 • 5/2024
Presseeinladung zur Konferenz: „Eine CO2-neutrale Zukunft: Wie kann das funktionieren?“ am 6. März 2024 am IWH
Kriege, Wirtschaftsflaute und gesellschaftliche Polarisierung setzen die grüne Transformation unter Druck. Wie sie dennoch gelingen kann, diskutiert eine Konferenz am Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) mit Gästen aus Wissenschaft, Politik und Industrie. Es sprechen unter anderem Julia Schlenz, Präsidentin von Dow Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz, sowie Sven Giegold, Staatssekretär im Bundeswirtschaftsministerium.
Read
Income Shocks, Political Support and Voting Behaviour
Richard Upward, Peter Wright
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 1,
2024
Abstract
We provide new evidence on the effects of economic shocks on political support, voting behaviour and political opinions over the last 25 years. We exploit a sudden, large and long-lasting shock in the form of job loss and trace out its impact on individual political outcomes for up to 10 years after the event. The availability of detailed information on households before and after the job loss event allows us to reweight a comparison group to closely mimic the job losers in terms of their observable characteristics, pre-existing political support and voting behaviour. We find consistent, long-lasting but quantitatively small effects on support and votes for the incumbent party, and short-lived effects on political engagement. We find limited impact on the support for fringe or populist parties. In the context of Brexit, opposition to the EU was much higher amongst those who lost their jobs, but this was largely due to pre-existing differences which were not exacerbated by the job loss event itself.
Read article
Media Response
Media Response August 2024 Reint Gropp: Zorn und Zaudern in: Handelsblatt, 30.08.2024 Reint Gropp: Warum die Beschäftigung trotz Dauerkrise steigt in: Handelsblatt, 30.08.2024…
See page
Committing to Grow: Employment Targets and Firm Dynamics
Ufuk Akcigit, Harun Alp, André Diegmann, Nicolas Serrano-Velarde
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 17,
2023
Abstract
This paper investigates a unique policy designed to maintain employment during the privatization of East German firms after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The policy required new owners of the firms to commit to employment targets, with penalties for non-compliance. Using a dynamic model, we highlight three channels through which employment targets impact firms: distorted employment decisions, increased productivity, and higher exit rates. Our empirical analysis, using a novel dataset and instrumental variable approach, confirms these findings. We estimate a 22% points higher annual employment growth rate, a 14% points higher annual productivity growth, and a 3.6% points higher probability of exit for firms with binding employment targets. Our calibrated model further demonstrates that without these targets, aggregate employment would have been 15% lower after 10 years. Additionally, an alternative policy of productivity investment subsidies proved costly and less effective in the short term.
Read article
Archive
Media Response Archive 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 December 2021 IWH: Ausblick auf Wirtschaftsjahr 2022 in Sachsen mit Bezug auf IWH-Prognose zu Ostdeutschland: "Warum Sachsens…
See page
Alumni
IWH Alumni The IWH maintains contact with its former employees worldwide. We involve our alumni in our work and keep them informed, for example, with a newsletter. We also plan…
See page
DPE Course Programme Archive
DPE Course Programme Archive 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2024 Macroeconomics several lecturers summer term 2024 (IWH) Macroeconomics with…
See page
Homepage
IWH Summer Forecast The German economy is still on the defensive, but signs of an end to the downturn are increasing. Production expands only modestly during summer. From the…
See page