1. About the IWH
  2. Team
  3. President

Professor Reint E. Gropp, PhD

Professor Reint E. Gropp, PhD
Current Position

since 11/14

President

Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH) – Member of the Leibniz Association

since 10/14

Professor of Economics

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg

download CV
Research Interests
  • financial economics
  • macroeconomics
  • corporate finance
  • money and banking

Reint E. Gropp has been the President of IWH and Full Professor of Economics at the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg since 2014. He is Associate Fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) and serves as consultant for various central banks.

Reint E. Gropp studied economics at the universities of Freiburg and Wisconsin-Madison, where he obtained a PhD in 1994. Prior to his appointment at the IWH, he held the endowed Chair for Sustainable Banking and Finance at Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main and worked for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as well as the European Central Bank (ECB), where he was Deputy Head of the Financial Research Division.

Your contact

Professor Reint E. Gropp, PhD
Professor Reint E. Gropp, PhD
- Department Präsidialbereich
Send Message +49 345 7753-700 Personal page

Publications

Citations
8325

cover_kritv.png

Banken und Finanzmarktunion: Wo stehen wir?

Reint E. Gropp Vera Wolter

in: KritV Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, No. 3, 2024

Abstract

<p>Schon seit vielen Jahren ist das Produktivitätswachstum in den USA höher als in Europa, was zu immer größer-werdenden Unterschieden im Pro-Kopf-Einkommen zwischen den beiden Ländern führt. Dieser Artikel dokumentiert, dass die geringere Firmendynamik, das heißt, weniger Eintritt und Austritt von Firmen in den Markt und damit weniger Innovation, ein wichtiger erklärender Faktor für die Unterschiede im Produktivitätswachstum darstellen. Im zweiten Teil des Beitrags werden die drei wichtigsten Initiativen der EU-Politik gegenübergestellt und aufgezeigt, welche Ziele sie verfolgen und wie mehr oder weniger erfolgreich sie tatsächlich implementiert werden. Während ein stabileres Bankensystem für den Erfolg der Bankenunion spricht, kann wenig Fortschritt im Bereich der theoretisch erfolgsversprechenden Absichten und Mechanismen der Kapitalmarktunion verzeichnet werden. Es ist anzuzweifeln, ob der Chips Act die angestrebten geostrategischen Ziele erfüllen kann. Initiativen auf nationaler Ebene bleiben aufgrund der Komplexität und Fragmentierung der europäischen Kapitalmärkte ein wichtiger Faktor.</p>

read publication
cover_journal-of-financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis.gif

Supranational Rules, National Discretion: Increasing versus Inflating Regulatory Bank Capital?

Reint E. Gropp Thomas Mosk Steven Ongena Ines Simac Carlo Wix

in: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, No. 2, 2024

Abstract

We study how banks use “regulatory adjustments” to inflate their regulatory capital ratios and whether this depends on forbearance on the part of national authorities. Using the 2011 EBA capital exercise as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that banks substantially inflated their levels of regulatory capital via a reduction in regulatory adjustments — without a commensurate increase in book equity and without a reduction in bank risk. We document substantial heterogeneity in regulatory capital inflation across countries, suggesting that national authorities forbear their domestic banks to meet supranational requirements, with a focus on short-term economic considerations.

read publication
cover_economic-inquiry.jpg

The Cleansing Effect of Banking Crises

Reint E. Gropp Steven Ongena Jörg Rocholl Vahid Saadi

in: Economic Inquiry, No. 3, 2022

Abstract

We assess the cleansing effects of the 2008–2009 financial crisis. U.S. regions with higher levels of supervisory forbearance on distressed banks see less restructuring in the real sector: fewer establishments, firms, and jobs are lost when more distressed banks remain in business. In these regions, the banking sector has been less healthy for several years after the crisis. Regions with less forbearance experience higher productivity growth after the crisis with more firm entries, job creation, and employment, wages, patents, and output growth. Forbearance is greater for state-chartered banks and in regions with weaker banking competition and more independent banks.

read publication
Browse all refereed publications

Working Papers

cover_DP_2024-07.jpg

Do Public Bank Guarantees Affect Labor Market Outcomes? Evidence from Individual Employment and Wages

Laura Baessler Georg Gebhardt Reint E. Gropp Andre Guettler Ahmet Taskin

in: IWH Discussion Papers, No. 7, 2024

Abstract

We investigate whether employees in Germany benefit from public bank guarantees in terms of employment probability and wages. To that end, we exploit the removal of public bank guarantees in Germany in 2001 as a quasi-natural experiment. Our results show that bank guarantees lead to higher employment, but lower wage prospects for employees after working in affected establishments. Overall the results suggest that employees do not benefit from bank guarantees.

read publication
cover_DP_2019-19.jpg

Flight from Safety: How a Change to the Deposit Insurance Limit Affects Households‘ Portfolio Allocation

H. Evren Damar Reint E. Gropp Adi Mordel

in: IWH Discussion Papers, No. 19, 2019

Abstract

We study how an increase to the deposit insurance limit affects households‘ portfolio allocation by exogenously reducing uninsured deposit balances. Using unique data that identifies insured versus uninsured deposits, along with detailed information on Canadian households‘ portfolio holdings, we show that households respond by drawing down deposits and shifting towards mutual funds and stocks. These outflows amount to 2.8% of outstanding bank deposits. The empirical evidence, consistent with a standard portfolio choice model that is modified to accommodate uninsured deposits, indicates that more generous deposit insurance coverage results in nontrivial adjustments to household portfolios.

read publication
cover_DP_2019-06.jpg

What Drives Banks‘ Geographic Expansion? The Role of Locally Non-diversifiable Risk

Reint E. Gropp Felix Noth Ulrich Schüwer

in: IWH Discussion Papers, No. 6, 2019

Abstract

We show that banks that are facing relatively high locally non-diversifiable risks in their home region expand more across states than banks that do not face such risks following branching deregulation in the 1990s and 2000s. These banks with high locally non-diversifiable risks also benefit relatively more from deregulation in terms of higher bank stability. Further, these banks expand more into counties where risks are relatively high and positively correlated with risks in their home region, suggesting that they do not only diversify but also build on their expertise in local risks when they expand into new regions.

read publication
Browse all working papers

Topics

Financial Markets Monetary Policy Brexit The new Europe Growth Productivity Financial Crisis Financial Stability Innovations Social Mobility Demographic Change East Germany Corona
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoSupported by the BMWK