The Impact of Debtor Distress and Unemployment on Support for Extremist and Populist Political Parties in the Czech Republic 2001–2017

In this study, we analyze the relationships between rising rates of distraint orders and electoral support for populist political parties and extreme left and right wing political parties at the local level. (This publication is written in czech language.)

15. April 2024

Autoren Jakub Grossmann Štěpán Jurajda Lucie Zapletalová

Increasing numbers of people subject to distraint orders had a negative impact on voter turnout and led to a rise in the electoral success of extreme right and and populist political parties (SPD and ANO in the Czech Republic). A 10 percentage point (p.p.) increase in the numbers of people subject to distraint (e.g., an increase from 2 % to 12 %, in a typical Czech municipality with a low rate of distraint to a typical municipality with a high rate of distraint) led to a 1 p.p. increase in the percentage of electoral gains for the extreme right wing (in 2017, extreme right wing parties attained 10.6 % of the national vote) and a 3 p.p. increase for populists (who attained 40.3 % of the vote in 2017).

In contrast, support for the extreme left wing (KSČM) decreased as the frequency of distraint orders increased. A 10 p.p. increase in the share of persons subject to distraint orders (e.g., from 2 % to 12 %) reduced KSČM’s electoral outcomes by more than 3.5 p.p. (in 2017 the extreme left wing obtained just 7.8 % of the vote).

Local increases in unemployment, and therefore in economic hardship, had a similar impact on electoral behaviour in terms of magnitude as did increases in distraint, but in the opposite direction. A 10 p.p. increase in unemployment (e.g., from a good situation of 3 % to 13 % unemployment, a worse situation than during the 2008 economic crisis) resulted in a 2 p.p. increase in voter turnout (which was 60.8 % in 2017), and a 4.5 p.p. increase in support for the extreme left. The extreme right experienced a worse electoral result, by 2 p.p., and populist parties lost 3.5 p.p. of the vote.

Further analysis shows that the observed support for extreme right wing and populist political parties likely did not come from persons who were directly affected by distraint, but rather from their “neighbours” who were not directly affected. This may be related to the fact that, while voters in the Sudeten regions have long been accustomed to a poor socio-economic situation (higher unemployment rates, social exclusion, etc.), voters in other regions of the Republic experienced this distraint situation for the first time, and attempted to solve it by voting new populist and extreme right-wing parties.

Our findings suggest that the reduction in support for KSČM with the increase in distraint orders we observe is not the result of voters in indebted localities failing to turn out to vote, but is due to those voters choosing to support extreme right-wing or populist political parties.

This study is based on the academic paper “Voting under Debtor Distress” by Jakub Grossmann and Štěpán Jurajda (2023).

Empfohlene Publikationen

The Long-term Legacy of the Liberation of the Sudetenland by the Red and US Armies

Jakub Grossmann Štěpán Jurajda

in: IDEA CERGE EI Studie, Nr. 7, 2022

Abstract

Forced migration results in trauma to the millions of people displaced from their homes, but very little is known about the fate of those who avoided expulsion and became a minority in the new society. This analysis reveals how and to what degree the manner and extent of the post-war expulsion of the German population from the Sudetenland influenced the country’s long-term social development. (This publication is written in czech language.)

Publikation lesen

cover_ifo-dresden-berichtet-6-2022.jpg

Bleibender Eindruck: Nicht vertriebene Sudetendeutsche prägen die politische Landschaft in Tschechien bis heute

Jakub Grossmann Štěpán Jurajda Felix Rösel

in: ifo Dresden berichtet, Nr. 6, 2022

Abstract

Nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg wurden mehr als 3 Mill. Sudetendeutsche aus der Tschechoslowakei ver trieben. Rund 100 000 unverzichtbare Industriebeschäftigte sowie 100 000 sudetendeutsche Antifaschisten blieben jedoch. Ihr Schicksal war bisher weitgehend unbeleuchtet. Wir zeigen, dass in Regionen mit vielen zurück gebliebenen deutschen Antifaschisten die Kommunistische Partei Tschechiens bis heute stärker verankert ist. Die deutschen Antifaschisten engagierten sich frühzeitig für den Kommunismus und gaben über Partei strukturen und innerhalb von Familien ihre Werte weiter. Nichtvertriebene können damit eine neue Mehr heitsgesellschaft nach ethnischen Säuberungen mitprägen, auch wenn sie selbst zur Minderheit gehören.

Publikation lesen

Ihr Kontakt

Für Wissenschaftler/innen

Für Journalistinnen/en

Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoGefördert durch das BMWK