Who Benefits from Place-based Policies? Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data
Philipp Grunau, Florian Hoffmann, Thomas Lemieux, Mirko Titze
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 11,
2024
Abstract
We study the wage and employment effects of a German place-based policy using a research design that exploits conditionally exogenous EU-wide rules governing the program parameters at the regional level. The place-based program subsidizes investments to create jobs with a subsidy rate that varies across labor market regions. The analysis uses matched data on the universe of establishments and their employees, establishment-level panel data on program participation, and regional scores that generate spatial discontinuities in program eligibility and generosity. These rich data enable us to study the incidence of the place-based program on different groups of individuals. We find that the program helps establishments create jobs that disproportionately benefit younger and less-educated workers. Funded establishments increase their wages but, unlike employment, wage gains do not persist in the long run. Employment effects estimated at the local area level are slightly larger than establishment-level estimates, suggesting limited spillover effects. Using subsidy rates as an instrumental variable for actual subsidies indicates that it costs approximately EUR 25,000 to create a new job in the economically disadvantaged areas targeted by the program.
Artikel Lesen
Medienecho
Medienecho Dezember 2024 Oliver Holtemöller: So teuer sind die Wahlversprechen der Parteien in: Handelsblatt, 19.12.2024 IWH: Experten: Deutsche Wirtschaft schrumpft 2024 doch…
Zur Seite
Archiv
Medienecho-Archiv 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Dezember 2021 IWH: Ausblick auf Wirtschaftsjahr 2022 in Sachsen mit Bezug auf IWH-Prognose zu Ostdeutschland: "Warum Sachsens…
Zur Seite
Kurzportrait
Das IWH im Kurzportrait Das Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) wurde mit Wirkung zum 1. Januar 1992 gegründet. Als Institut der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft wird sein…
Zur Seite
Projekte
Unsere Projekte 07.2022 ‐ 12.2026 Evaluierung des InvKG und des Bundesprogrammes STARK Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK) Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums…
Zur Seite
Schweigeperiode Gemeinschaftsdiagnose Frühjahr 2023
Schweigeperiode Gemeinschaftsdiagnose Frühjahr 2023 von Oliver Holtemöller, 16.03.2023 Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, die Schweigepflicht gegenüber den Medien anlässlich der…
Zur Seite
Schweigeperiode Gemeinschaftsdiagnose Frühjahr 2022
Schweigeperiode Gemeinschaftsdiagnose Frühjahr 2022 von Oliver Holtemöller, 18.03.2022 Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, heute (Freitag, 18.03.) beginnt für das IWH die…
Zur Seite
International Trade Barriers and Regional Employment: The Case of a No-Deal Brexit
Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Oliver Holtemöller
Journal of Economic Structures,
Nr. 11,
2021
Abstract
We use the World Input–Output Database (WIOD) combined with regional sectoral employment data to estimate the potential regional employment effects of international trade barriers. We study the case of a no-deal Brexit in which imports to the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU) would be subject to tariffs and non-tariff trade costs. First, we derive the decline in UK final goods imports from the EU from industry-specific international trade elasticities, tariffs and non-tariff trade costs. Using input–output analysis, we estimate the potential output and employment effects for 56 industries and 43 countries on the national level. The absolute effects would be largest in big EU countries which have close trade relationships with the UK, such as Germany and France. However, there would also be large countries outside the EU which would be heavily affected via global value chains, such as China, for example. The relative effects (in percent of total employment) would be largest in Ireland followed by Belgium. In a second step, we split up the national effects on the NUTS-2 level for EU member states and additionally on the county (NUTS-3) level for Germany. The share of affected workers varies between 0.03% and 3.4% among European NUTS-2 regions and between 0.15% and 0.4% among German counties. A general result is that indirect effects via global value chains, i.e., trade in intermediate inputs, are more important than direct effects via final demand.
Artikel Lesen
