Die Automobilindustrie in den neuen Bundesländern (Studie im Auftrag des Verbands der Automobilindustrie (VDA))
Jutta Günther, Albrecht Bochow
Einzelveröffentlichungen,
No. 3,
2005
Abstract
Basierend auf Daten der amtlichen Statistik und Mikrodaten zur Automobilzulieferindustrie legt die Studie eine umfassende Bestandsaufnahme zur Entwicklung der Automobilindustrie in den neuen Bundesländern vor. Ausgehend von einer Darstellung der Beschäftigung, des Umsatzes und der Produktivität seit Beginn der Transformation wird ferner auf die regionale Verteilung der Aktivitäten der Automobilindustrie und deren ausgeprägte Verflechtung mit anderen Branchen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes und des Dienstleistungsektors eingegangen. Die Mikrodaten des IIC (Industrial Investment Council) zur ostdeutschen Automobilzulieferindustrie, die sich nicht auf die statistische Kategorie „Herstellung von Teilen und Zubehör“ beschränken, sondern Teile- und Ausrüstungslieferanten der Automobilhersteller über alle Branchen hinweg erfassen, erlauben schließlich eine Bezifferung der gesamten mit der Automobilindustrie in Zusammenhang stehenden Beschäftigung und – auf Basis der Ortsangaben – auch eine genaue Lokalisierung der Betriebe. Rechnet man die Beschäftigten bei den Automobilherstellern (20.600), den Herstellern von Anhängern und Aufbauten (5.356) und der Zulieferern (111.901) zusammen, so beträgt die Zahl der direkt oder indirekt mit der Automobilindustrie verbundenen Beschäftigten in den neuen Bundesländern fast 138.000. Die Zentren der ostdeutschen Automobilindustrie liegen in Sachsen und Thüringen, obwohl sich Zulieferer inzwischen in allen Regionen Ostdeutschlands niedergelassen haben. Das zeigen die Auswertungen der amtlichen Statistik wie auch die genaue kartographische Darstellung mittels der Mikrodaten.
Read article
Non-market Allocation in Transport: A Reassessment of its Justification and the Challenge of Institutional Transition
Ulrich Blum
50 Years of Transport Research: Experiences Gained and Major Challenges Ahead,
2005
Abstract
Economic theory knows two systems of coordination: through public choice or through the market principle. If the market is chosen, then it may either be regulated, or it may be fully competitive (or be in between these two extremes). This paper first inquires into the reasons for regulation, it analyses the reasons for the important role of government in the transportation sector, especially in the procurement of infrastructure. Historical reasons are seen as important reasons for bureaucratic objections to deregulation. Fundamental economic concepts are forwarded that suggest market failure and justify a regulatory environment. The reasons for regulation cited above, however, may be challenged; we forward theoretical concepts from industrial organization theory and from institutional economics which suggest that competition is even possible on the level of infrastructure. The transition from a strongly regulated to a competitive environment poses problems that have given lieu to numerous failures in privatization and deregulation. Structural inertia plays an important role, and the incentive-compatible management of infrastructure is seen as the key element of any liberal transportation policy. It requires that the setting of rules on the meta level satisfies both local and global efficiency ends. We conclude that, in market economies, competition and regulation should not be substitutes but complements. General rules, an "ethic of competition" have to be set that guarantee a level playing field to agents; it is complimented by institutions that provide arbitration in case of misconduct.
Read article
Technology spillovers from foreign investors in transition economies - are the effects still expected?
Jutta Günther
Economic and business review,
No. 1,
2005
Abstract
While it is widely acknowledged that there is a technology transfer from parent companies to foreign subsidiaries in central East European countries, there is no clear cut evidence for technology spillovers in favour of domestic companies so far. The paper presents a theoretical framework for how spillover mechanisms are turned into a reality and outlines empirical findings on technology spillovers for transition economies based on a comprehensive literature review. Against the background of an empirical qualitative study, the paper provides firm level explanations for the obvious lack of technology spillovers. Policy oriented issues will be discussed in the conclusions.
Read article
Analysis of statements made in favour of and against the adoption of competition law in developing and transition economies
Johannes Stephan, Franz Kronthaler, Frank Emmert
Einzelveröffentlichungen,
No. 9,
2005
Abstract
The paper is concerned with documenting and assessing statements made by policymakers, opinion formers, and other stakeholders in favour and against the adoption of competition laws with particular reference to transition and developing countries which have not yet enacted these kind of laws. For example, claims that competition enforcement might reduce the inflow of foreign direct investment, or that other policies are successfully used as substitutes for competition law, are assessed. In a first step, the method of generalized analysis structures the list of statements around core issues of common features to make them accessible to further interpretation and assessment. The paper shows that some claims are in fact country or region specific, and specific to the development level of the respective countries. In a second step, the core issues are assessed according to economic and legal criteria. Since the analysis focuses on transition and developing countries, the criteria for economic assessment are predominantly economic growth and development issues, but also include the economic coherency of a set of claims submitted by stakeholders in a given country. The criteria for legal assessment include whether claims are problematic in light of WTO-principles, or are even born out of a political objective which is incompatible with the spirit, if not the letter of WTO-rules.
Read article
The Absence of Technology Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies
Jutta Günther
Structural Change and Exchange Rate Dynamics,
2005
Abstract
Read article
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics in Transition Economies
Albrecht Kauffmann
Structural Change and Exchange Rate Dynamics: The Economics of EU Eastern Enlargement,
2005
Abstract
Read article
Technology spillovers from external investors in East Germany: no overall effects in favor of domestic firms
Harald Lehmann, Jutta Günther
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 198,
2004
Abstract
The study deals with the question whether external (foreign and West German) investors in East Germany induce technological spillover effects in favor of domestic firms. It ties in with a number of other econometric spillover studies, especially for transition economies, which show rather mixed and inconclusive results so far. Different from existing spillover analyses, this study allows for a much deeper regional breakdown up to Raumordnungsregionen and uses a branch classification that explicitly considers intermediate and investment good linkages. The regression results show no positive correlation between the presence of external investors and domestic firms’ productivity, no matter which regional breakdown is looked at (East Germany as a whole, federal states, or Raumordnungsregionen). Technology spillovers which may exist in particular cases are obviously not strong enough to increase the domestic firms’ overall productivity.
Read article
Women´s attitudes towards employment and to employment and family
Andrea Besenthal, Cornelia Lang
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 1,
2004
Abstract
Für Deutschland zeigen sich trotz inzwischen weitestgehend einheitlicher institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen nach wie vor deutliche Unterschiede in der Erwerbsbeteiligung von ost- und westdeutschen Frauen. Die Zahl der erwerbstätigen Frauen ist in den letzten Jahren in den alten Bundesländern gestiegen; in den neuen Ländern ist sie leicht gesunken, bewegt sich aber dennoch auf hohem Niveau. Diese Differenzen lassen sich erklären durch die unterschiedlichen Erwerbsmuster, die bei der Wiedervereinigung aufeinander trafen, aber auch durch unterschiedliche ökonomische Gegebenheiten in den Haushalten und dem regional und qualitativ unterschiedlichen Angebot an Kinderbetreuungseinrichtungen.
Read article
Investment, Financial Markets, New Economy Dynamics and Growth in Transition Countries
Albrecht Kauffmann, P. J. J. Welfens
Economic Opening Up and Growth in Russia: Finance, Trade, Market Institutions, and Energy,
2004
Abstract
The transition to a market economy in the former CMEA area is more than a decade old and one can clearly distinguish a group of relatively fast growing countries — including Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia — and a majority of slowly growing economies, including Russia and the Ukraine. Initial problems of transition were natural in the sense that systemic transition to a market economy has effectively destroyed part of the existing capital stock that was no longer profitable under the new relative prices imported from world markets; and there was a transitory inflationary push as low state-administered prices were replaced by higher market equilibrium prices. Indeed, systemic transformation in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union have brought serious transitory inflation problems and a massive transition recession; negative growth rates have continued over many years in some countries, including Russia and the Ukraine, where output growth was negative throughout the 1990s (except for Russia, which recorded slight growth in 1997). For political and economic reasons the economic performance of Russia is of particular relevance for the success of the overall transition process. If Russia would face stagnation and instability, this would undermine political and economic stability in the whole of Europe and prospects for integrating Russia into the world economy.
Read article
EU Accession Countries’ Specialisation Patterns in Foreign Trade and Domestic Production - What can we infer for catch-up prospects?
Johannes Stephan
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 184,
2003
Abstract
This paper supplements prior analysis on ‘patterns and prospects’ (Stephan, 2003) in which prospects for the speed of future productivity growth were assessed by looking at the specialisation patterns in domestic production. This analysis adds the foreign trade sphere to the results generated in the prior analysis. The refined results are broadly in line with the results from the original analysis, indicating the robustness of our methods applied in either analysis. The most prominent results pertain to Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. Those two countries appear to be best suited for swift productivity catch-up from the viewpoint of sectoral specialisation. Poland and Estonia exhibit the lowest potentials. Only for the case of Poland would results suggest bleak prospects.
Read article
