Analyzing Innovation Drivers in the German Laser Industry: the Role of Positioning in the Social and Geographical Space
Muhamed Kudic, Peter Bönisch, Iciar Dominguez Lacasa
Abstract
Empirical and theoretical contributions provide strong evidence that firm-level performance outcomes in terms of innovativeness can either be determined by the firm’s position in the social space (network effects) or by the firm’s position in the geographical space (co-location effects). Even though we can observe quite recently first attempts in bringing together these traditionally distinct research streams (Whittington et al. 2009), research on interdependent network and geographical co-location effects is still rare. Consequently, we seek to answer the following research question: considering that the effects of social and geographic proximity on firm’s innovativeness can be interdependent, what are the distinct and combined effects of firm’s network and geographic position on firm-level innovation output? We analyze the innovative performance of German laser source manufacturers between 1995 and 2007. We use an official database on publicly funded R&D collaboration projects in order to construct yearly networks and analyze firm’s network positions. Based on information on population entries and exits we calculate various types of geographical proximity measures between private sector and public research organizations (PRO). We use patent grants as dependent variable in order to measure firm-level innovation output. Empirical results provide evidence for distinct effect of network degree centrality. Distinct effect of firm’s geographical co-location to laser-related public research organization promotes patenting activity. Results on combined network and co-location effects confirms partially the existence of in-terdependent proximity effects, even though a closer look at these effects reveals some ambiguous but quite interesting findings.
Read article
Informal Social Networks and Spatial Mobility
Peter Bönisch, Lutz Schneider
Post-Communist Economies,
2010
Abstract
Die Präferenzen von Individuen in Transformationsregionen sind immer noch durch Prägungen des früheren sozialistischen Systems bestimmt. Diese These der sozialistischen Prägung wird im Beitrag getestet, indem untersucht wird, ob sich ein Einfluss der Sozialisation in einem solchen System auf die Akkumulation von Sozialkapital und, als Konsequenz, auf die Präferenzen für räumliche Mobilität nachweisen lässt. Gegenstand der Analyse ist der paradigmatische Fall Ostdeutschlands, wo die Mobilitätsneigung deutlich geringer zu sein scheint als im westlichen Teil. Auf Grundlage einer IV ordered probit Schätzung wird erstens belegt, dass Ostdeutsche, sofern sie im Sozialismus aufgewachsen sind, stärker in lokal gebundenes informelles Sozialkapital investiert sind. Zweitens bestätigt sich die These, dass eine Partizipation in derartigen Netzwerken die Mobilitätspräferenz verringert. Drittens zeigt sich, dass sich nach Kontrolle dieses Netzwerkeffektes der Mobilitätsrückstand der Ostdeutschen substantiell verringert. Die eher geringe räumliche Mobilität der ostdeutschen Bevölkerung erscheint daher zu einem erheblichen Teil den typischen Sozialkapitalmustern post-sozialistischer Gesellschaften geschuldet zu sein.
Read article
Why are East Germans not More Mobile? Analyzing the Impact of Social Ties on Regional Migration
Peter Bönisch, Lutz Schneider
Abstract
Individuals’ preferences in transition regions are still shaped by the former communist system. We test this ‘Communism legacy’ hypothesis by examining the impact of acculturation in a communist regime on social network participation and, as a consequence, on preferences for spatial mobility. We focus on the paradigmatic case of East Germany where mobility intentions seem to be substantially weaker than in the western part. Applying an IV ordered probit approach we firstly find that East German people acculturated in a Communist system are more invested in locally bounded informal social capital than West Germans. Secondly, we confirm that membership in such locally bounded social networks reduces the intention to move away. Thirdly, after controlling for the social network effect the mobility gap between East and West substantially reduces. Low spatial mobility of the eastern population, we conclude, is to an important part attributable to a social capital endowment characteristic to post-communist economies.
Read article
