Progressivity and Flexibility in Developing an Effective Competition Regime: Using Experiences of Poland, Ukraine, and South Africa for developing countries
Franz Kronthaler, Johannes Stephan
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 6,
2006
Abstract
The paper discusses the role of the concept of special and differential treatment in the framework of regional trade agreements for the development of a competition regime. After a discussion of the main characteristics and possible shortfalls of those concepts, three case countries are assessed in terms of their experience with progressivity, flexibility, and technical and financial assistance: Poland was led to align its competition laws to match the model of the EU. The Ukraine opted voluntarily for the European model, this despite its intense integration mainly with Russia. South Africa, a developing country that emerged from a highly segregated social fabric and an economy dominated by large conglomerates with concentrated ownership. All three countries enacted (or comprehensively reformed) their competition laws in an attempt to face the challenges of economic integration and catch up development on the one hand and particular social problems on the other. Hence, their experience may be pivotal for a variety of different developing countries who are in negotiations to include competition issues in regional trade agreements. The results suggest that the design of such competition issues have to reflect country-particularities to achieve an efficient competition regime.
Read article
Effects of the promotion of investment in East Germany
Joachim Ragnitz
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 186,
2003
Abstract
Im Mittelpunkt der Arbeit stehen Überlegungen zur Investitionsförderung in
Ostdeutschland. Die ökonometrische Analyse mit einem treatment-Ansatz auf
einzelwirtschaftlicher Ebene zeigt, dass die Förderung zu einer deutlichen Zunahme der Unternehmensinvestitionen beigetragen hat. Allerdings gibt es Hinweise darauf, dass ein Teil dieser Investitionen nur eine geringe Produktivität aufweist, also als eine Fehlallokation von Kapital anzusehen ist. Bei einer gesamtdeutschen Betrachtungsweise sind überdies negative Finanzierungs- und Verdrängungseffekte in Westdeutschland zu berücksichtigen. Es wird deshalb für eine allmähliche Einschränkung der Förderkulisse in den neuen Ländern plädiert.
Read article
