Preventing Innovative Cooperations: The Legal Exemptions Unintended Side Effect
Christian Growitsch, Nicole Nulsch, Margarethe Rammerstorfer
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 6,
2008
Abstract
In 2004, European competition law had been faced with considerable changes due to the introduction of the new Council Regulation No. 1/2003. One of the major renewals was the replacement of the centralized notification system for inter-company cooperations in favor of a so-called legal exemption system. We analyze the implications of this reform on the agreements firms implement. In contrast to previous research we focus on the reform’s impact on especially welfare enhancing, namely innovative agreements. We show that the law’s intention to reduce the incentive to establish illegal cartels will be reached. However, by the same mechanism, also highly innovative cooperations might be prevented. To avoid this unintended effect, we conclude that only fines but not the monitoring activities should be increased in order to deter illegal but not innovative agreements.
Artikel Lesen
International Banking and the Allocation of Risk
Claudia M. Buch
IAW Discussion Paper No. 32,
2007
Abstract
Macroeconomic risks could magnify individual bank risk. Mitigating the influence of economy-wide risks on banks could therefore be very important to maintain a smooth-running banking system. In this paper, we explore the extent to which macroeconomic risks affect banks. We use a bank-level dataset on over 2,000 banks worldwide for the years 1995-2002 to study the effect of macroeconomic volatility, the openness of the banking system, and banking regulations on bank risks. Our measure of bank risk is the volatility of banks' pre-tax profits. We find that macroeconomic volatility increases banks' profit volatility and that international openness of the banking system lowers bank risk. We find no impact of banking regulation on profit volatility. Our findings suggest that if policymakers want to lower bank risk, they should seek to lower macroeconomic volatility as well as increase openness in the banking system.
Artikel Lesen
Broadband Investment and the Threat of Regulation: Preventing Monopoly Exploitation or Infrastructure Construction?
Ulrich Blum, Christian Growitsch, Niels Krap
Review of Network Economics,
2007
Abstract
Die Investitionen seitens der Deutschen Telekom in die VDSL-Technologie wurden von ihr an die Bedingung der Regulierungsfreiheit geknüpft. Um eine Regulierungsstrategie zu entwickeln, die gleichzeitig Investitionen ermöglicht und monopolistische Preise verhindert, wird in diesem Beitrag die Investitionsentscheidung unter Regulierungsandrohung spieltheoretisch modelliert. Es wird gezeigt, daß die bloße Drohung einer Intervention durch den Regulierer Übergewinne verhindern kann. Der Regulierer kann die Investitionsentscheidung und den Preis des Investors über Signale über die Wahrscheinlichkeit des Eingreifens und den eventuellen Regulierungspreis beeinflussen.
Artikel Lesen
Requirements on Regulation Frameworks: What is the Best Way of Securing Efficiency in the Water Sector?
Peter Haug
Competition Policy in Network Industries, INFER Research Perspectives, Vol. 3,
2007
Abstract
Der Beitrag untersucht die Auswirkungen unterschiedlich gestalteter Regulierungssysteme auf die Effizienz der Wasserversorgung. Dazu werden zum einen diverse Anforderungen an effiziente Regulierungssysteme in modifizierter Form aus Studien zu anderen Netzwerkindustrien herangezogen. Zum anderen werden ergänzend weitere Bedingungen aus verschiedenen ökonomischen Theorien der Regulierung abgeleitet. Die Erfüllung der resultierenden Kriterien wird am Beispiel der Regulierungssysteme für die Wasserwirtschaft in den Niederlanden, Deutschland und den USA überprüft. Ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Leistungskennzahlen für die drei Länder legt die Vermutung nahe, daß möglicherweise ein Zusammenhang zwischen der Gestaltung des Ordnungsrahmens der Regulierung und dem Preis-Qualitäts-Verhältnis im Trinkwasserbereich besteht.
Artikel Lesen
Bank Lending, Bank Capital Regulation and Efficiency of Corporate Foreign Investment
Diemo Dietrich, Achim Hauck
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 4,
2007
Abstract
In this paper we study interdependencies between corporate foreign investment and the capital structure of banks. By committing to invest predominantly at home, firms can reduce the credit default risk of their lending banks. Therefore, banks can refinance loans to a larger extent through deposits thereby reducing firms’ effective financing costs. Firms thus have an incentive to allocate resources inefficiently as they then save on financing costs. We argue that imposing minimum capital adequacy for banks can eliminate this incentive by putting a lower bound on financing costs. However, the Basel II framework is shown to miss this potential.
Artikel Lesen
Banks’ Internationalization Strategies: The Role of Bank Capital Regulation
Diemo Dietrich, Uwe Vollmer
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 18,
2006
Abstract
This paper studies how capital requirements influence a bank’s mode of entry into foreign financial markets. We develop a model of an internationally operating bank that creates and allocates liquidity across countries and argue that the advantage of multinational banking over offering cross-border financial services depends on the benefit and the cost of intimacy with local markets. The benefit is that it allows to create more liquidity. The cost is that it causes inefficiencies in internal capital markets, on which a multinational bank relies to allocate liquidity across countries. Capital requirements affect this trade-off by influencing the degree of inefficiency in internal capital markets.
Artikel Lesen
Obesity, voracity, and short stature: the impact of glutamate on the regulation of appetite.
M. Hermanussen, A.P. García, Marco Sunder, M. Voigt, V. Salazar, J. A. F. Tresguerres
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 60 (1),
2006
Abstract
Artikel Lesen
Network Investment and the Threat of Regulation – Preventing Monopoly Exploitation or Infrastructure Construction?
Ulrich Blum, Christian Growitsch, Niels Krap
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 7,
2006
Abstract
In summer 2005, the German telecommunication incumbent Deutsche Telekom announced its plans to build a new broadband fibre optics network. Deutsche Telekom decided as precondition for this new network not to be regulated with respect to pricing and third party access. To develop a regulator's strategy that allows investments and prevents monopolistic prices at the same time, we model an incumbent's decision problem under a threat of regulation in a game-theoretical context. The decision whether to invest or not depends on the probability of regulation and its assumed impact on investment returns. Depending on the incumbent's expectation on these parameters, he will decide if the investment is favourable, and which price to best set. This price is below a non-regulated profit maximising price, since the incumbent tries to circumvent regulation. Thus, we show that the mere threat of a regulator's intervention might prevent supernormal profits without actual price regulation. The regulator, on the other hand, can influence both investment decision and the incumbent's price via his signals on regulation probability and price. These signals an be considered optimal, if they simultaneously allow investment and minimize the incumbent's price.
Artikel Lesen
Essays on Network Regulation – Theoretical and Empirical Evidence from the Electricity Supply Industry
Christian Growitsch
Schriften des IWH,
Nr. 21,
2005
Abstract
Mit dem Etablieren des gemeinsamen Europäischen Binnenmarktes im Laufe der 80er und 90er Jahre des vergangenen Jahrhunderts und dem damit verbundenen Wegfall von Handelsbarrieren und anderen Wettbewerbshemmnissen rückte die Liberalisierung sogenannter Netzindustrien in den Fokus der Europäischen Politik. Die Deregulierung solcher Sektoren mit physischer Netzinfrastruktur, insbesondere der Märkte für Strom, Gas, Telekommunikation und Schienenverkehr wurde zu einem wesentlichen Aspekt des Ziels der Förderung von Wettbewerb in der Europäischen Ökonomie. Die Einführung wettbewerblicher Strukturen in die ehemalig monopolistischen Netzindustrien bedingte die Notwendigkeit wettbewerbspolitischer Reformen auf nationaler und Europäischer Ebene. Insbesondere die Sicherstellung gleicher Wettbewerbsbedingungen und der Schutz der Verbraucher vor Marktmachtmißbrauch durch die etablierten Anbieter rückte in den Fokus der Wirtschaftspolitik und führte zum Aufbau sektorspezifischer Regulierungsregime. Diese unterscheiden sich deutlich sowohl sektoral wie im Hinblick auf nationale Ordnungsrahmen hinsichtlich ihrer Rahmenbedingungen, ihrer Methoden, ihrer Struktur und ihrer ökonomischen Wirkung. Der Austausch und die Übertragung von Erkenntnissen und Erfahrungen und die kontinuierliche Verbesserung bestehender institutioneller Arrangements sollte daher ein bedeutender Aspekt ökonomischer Forschung und staatlicher Wirtschaftspolitik sein. Die hier vorliegende Sammlung energieökonomischer Aufsätze zielt auf eben jenen Erkenntnistransfer ab. Dazu wird in den ersten beiden Artikeln ein spezifisches Regulierungsregime, der sogenannte verhandelte Netzzugang, und die damit verbundenen Erfahrungen aus dem deutschen Elektrizitätsmarkt vorgestellt. Ein dritter Aufsatz beschäftigt sich mit der Versorgungsqualität in Netzsektoren am Beispiel lokaler Stromverteilnetzbetreiber in einem europäischen Vergleich.
Artikel Lesen
Non-market Allocation in Transport: A Reassessment of its Justification and the Challenge of Institutional Transition
Ulrich Blum
50 Years of Transport Research: Experiences Gained and Major Challenges Ahead,
2005
Abstract
Economic theory knows two systems of coordination: through public choice or through the market principle. If the market is chosen, then it may either be regulated, or it may be fully competitive (or be in between these two extremes). This paper first inquires into the reasons for regulation, it analyses the reasons for the important role of government in the transportation sector, especially in the procurement of infrastructure. Historical reasons are seen as important reasons for bureaucratic objections to deregulation. Fundamental economic concepts are forwarded that suggest market failure and justify a regulatory environment. The reasons for regulation cited above, however, may be challenged; we forward theoretical concepts from industrial organization theory and from institutional economics which suggest that competition is even possible on the level of infrastructure. The transition from a strongly regulated to a competitive environment poses problems that have given lieu to numerous failures in privatization and deregulation. Structural inertia plays an important role, and the incentive-compatible management of infrastructure is seen as the key element of any liberal transportation policy. It requires that the setting of rules on the meta level satisfies both local and global efficiency ends. We conclude that, in market economies, competition and regulation should not be substitutes but complements. General rules, an "ethic of competition" have to be set that guarantee a level playing field to agents; it is complimented by institutions that provide arbitration in case of misconduct.
Artikel Lesen