How does Institutional Setting Affect the Impact of EU Structural Funds on Economic Cohesion? New Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe
Marina Grusevaja, Toralf Pusch
Journal of Common Market Studies,
2012
Abstract
Structural Funds are the main instrument of the EU Cohesion Policy. Their effective use is subject to an ongoing debate in political and scientific circles. European fiscal assistance under this heading should promote economic and social cohesion in the member states of the European Union. Recently the domestic institutional capacity to absorb, to distribute and to invest Structural Funds effectively has become a crucial determinant of the cohesion process and has attracted attention of the scientific community. The aim of this study is to shed light on the effectiveness of Structural Funds in the countries of the first Central and Eastern European enlargement round in 2004. Using regional data for these countries we have a look on the impact of several institutional governance variables on the effectiveness of Structural Funds. In the interpretation of results reference is made to regional economics. Results of the empirical analysis indicate an influence of certain institutional variables on the effectiveness of Structural Funds in the new member states.
Artikel Lesen
Monetary Policy in a World Where Money (Also) Matters
Makram El-Shagi, Sebastian Giesen
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 6,
2012
Abstract
While the long-run relation between money and inflation as predicted by the quantity theory is well established, empirical studies of the short-run adjustment process have been inconclusive at best. The literature regarding the validity of the quantity theory within a given economy is mixed. Previous research has found support for quantity theory within a given economy by combining the P-Star, the structural VAR and the monetary aggregation literature. However, these models lack precise modelling of the short-run dynamics by ignoring interest rates as the main policy instrument. Contrarily, most New Keynesian approaches, while excellently modeling the short-run dynamics transmitted through interest rates, ignore the role of money and thus the potential mid-and long-run effects of monetary policy. We propose a parsimonious and fairly unrestrictive econometric model that allows a detailed look into the dynamics of a monetary policy shock by accounting for changes in economic equilibria, such as potential output and money demand, in a framework that allows for both monetarist and New Keynesian transmission mechanisms, while also considering the Barnett critique. While we confirm most New Keynesian findings concerning the short-run dynamics, we also find strong evidence for a substantial role of the quantity of money for price movements.
Artikel Lesen
Im Fokus: Technologie- und Gründerzentren in Mittel- und Osteuropa
Michael Schwartz, Sebastian Blesse
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 4,
2012
Abstract
Inspiriert durch die Beispiele westlicher Staaten sind Technologie-, Gründer- und Innovationszentren (TGZ) auch in mittel- und osteuropäischen (MOE-)Ländern aus dem Spektrum wirtschaftspolitischer Maßnahmen nicht mehr wegzudenken. Die Errichtung von TGZ in MOE-Ländern folgt der generellen Annahme, dass diese als
zentrale Katalysatoren hin zu einer mittelstands- und existenzgründungsbasierten Restrukturierung ökonomischer Systeme fungieren können. Neben der Unterstützung von Unternehmensgründungen und kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen wird von TGZ außerdem beispielsweise erwartet, dass sie den regionalen Wissens- und Technologietransfer beschleunigen. Gegenwärtig ist nicht bekannt, inwiefern TGZ in MOE-Ländern den verschiedenen Facetten ihres Auftrags gerecht werden. Um diesbezüglichen Untersuchungen eine Datengrundlage bereitzustellen, hat das IWH im Rahmen der Aktualisierung der IWH-TGZ-Datenbank eine Erweiterung auf ausgewählte MOELänder vorgenommen: Polen, die Tschechische Republik, die Slowakei sowie Lettland, Estland und Litauen. Der Beitrag stellt erste Ergebnisse dieser Erhebungswelle vor.
Artikel Lesen
5. Konferenz „Analysen und Politik für Ostdeutschland – aus der Forschung des IWH“ – ein Bericht
Gerhard Heimpold, Marie Ebert
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 2,
2012
Abstract
Der Beitrag berichtet über den Inhalt der Tagung „Analysen und Politik für Ostdeutschland – aus der Forschung des IWH“ am 21. September 2011, die – wie bereits die vier Vorgängerveranstaltungen seit 2007 – ein wirtschaftspolitisches Fachpublikum mit neuen Forschungsergebnissen des IWH vertraut machte. Im ersten Teil der Tagung lag, beginnend mit dem Eröffnungsvortrag der Ministerin für Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, Prof. Dr. Birgitta Wolff, der thematische Schwerpunkt bei Fragen der Innovationsförderung, des Technologietransfers und der Wissensflüsse. Diese Faktoren gelten – nicht nur in Ostdeutschland – als wichtig für die wirtschaftliche Konvergenz oder Divergenz von Regionen. Anschließend wurden auf der makroökonomischen Ebene Faktoren analysiert, die das Wirtschaftswachstum in Ostdeutschland beeinflussen. Es folgte ein Beitrag über die Effekte des Programms „Stadtumbau Ost“ für den Immobilienmarkt, bei dem Wirkungen von Abriss- und Aufwertungsmaßnahmen untersucht worden waren. Der abschließende Beitrag hatte die künftige Ausgestaltung der EU-Strukturpolitik zum Gegenstand, die bislang die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in den Neuen Ländern massiv unterstützt hat.
Artikel Lesen
Incubator Organizations as Entrepreneurship and SME Policy Instrument in Transition Economies: A Survey among six Countries
Michael Schwartz, Sebastian Blesse
Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
Nr. 3,
2011
Abstract
Within incubator-incubation research, there is a predominant focus on incubator organizations located in industrialized or developed economies. Knowledge regarding the evolution of incubators located in transition economies is almost non-existent. However, meanwhile a significant number of incubators have been established since the fall of the iron curtain in many Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries as well. Here, the present paper sets in through providing evidence on the development, distribution and structural characteristics of incubators in six selected CEE countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia). We show that incubator organizations have become a central element of support infrastructure for SME and entrepreneurship in CEE countries during the past 20 years. We further argue that by drawing upon the accumulated experience with incubators in developed Western (European) economies, there are important lessons to be learned for incubator stakeholders in transition economies. We, therefore, outline particular suggestions considered to be vital for long-term successful incubation processes in transition economies.
Artikel Lesen
Towards Unrestricted Public Use Business Microdata: The Synthetic Longitudinal Business Database
John M. Abowd, Ron S. Jarmin, Satkartar K. Kinney, Javier Miranda, Jerome P. Reiter, Arnold P. Reznek
International Statistical Review,
Nr. 3,
2011
Abstract
In most countries, national statistical agencies do not release establishment-level business microdata, because doing so represents too large a risk to establishments’ confidentiality. One approach with the potential for overcoming these risks is to release synthetic data; that is, the released establishment data are simulated from statistical models designed to mimic the distributions of the underlying real microdata. In this article, we describe an application of this strategy to create a public use file for the Longitudinal Business Database, an annual economic census of establishments in the United States comprising more than 20 million records dating back to 1976. The U.S. Bureau of the Census and the Internal Revenue Service recently approved the release of these synthetic microdata for public use, making the synthetic Longitudinal Business Database the first-ever business microdata set publicly released in the United States. We describe how we created the synthetic data, evaluated analytical validity, and assessed disclosure risk.
Artikel Lesen
How does Institutional Setting Affect the Impact of EU Structural Funds on Economic Cohesion? New Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe
Marina Grusevaja, Toralf Pusch
Abstract
Structural Funds are the main instrument of the EU cohesion policy. Their effective use is subject to an ongoing debate in political and scientific circles. European fiscal assistance under this heading should promote economic and social cohesion in the member states of the European Union. Recently, the domestic institutional capacity to absorb, to distribute and to invest Structural Funds effectively has become a crucial determinant of the cohesion process and has attracted attention of the scientific community. The aim of this study is to shed light on the effectiveness of Structural Funds in the countries of the first Central and Eastern European enlargement round in 2004. Using regional data for these countries, we have a look on the impact of several institutional governance variables on the effectiveness of Structural Funds. In the interpretation of results, reference is
made to regional economics. Results of the empirical analysis indicate an influence of certain institutional variables on the effectiveness of Structural Funds in the new member states.
Artikel Lesen
Clusterpolitiken in Bayern und Thüringen: Förderpraxis nimmt wenig Rücksicht auf theoretische Vorbehalte
Gerhard Heimpold
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
Nr. 10,
2011
Abstract
Der Beitrag analysiert anhand veröffentlichter Dokumente die Clusterpolitiken in den Ländern Bayern und Thüringen. Ziel dieser Politiken ist die Stärkung der Innovationskraft. Eine explizite allokationspolitische Begründung
für Clusterpolitik mit dem Vorliegen von Externalitäten, Informationsasymmetrien oder Koordinierungsmängeln ist in den Dokumenten nicht sichtbar. Es bleibt daher offen, ob die praktizierte Clusterpolitik tatsächlich ursachenadäquat
ist. Beide Länder fokussieren auf die Unterstützung landesweiter Cluster und Netzwerke. Dadurch könnten aber die Vorteile räumlicher Nähe zu wenig Beachtung finden. Nicht ohne Probleme ist auch die ex ante vorgenommene Auswahl von Branchen und Technologiefeldern in den Clusterpolitiken beider Länder, selbst wenn aus den Eigendarstellungen der fördernden Ressorts Offenheit für Neues ablesbar ist. Denn dem Staat mangelt es generell an Informationen über die Zukunftsfähigkeit von Branchen und Technologien. Der Verzicht auf einen
Branchenfokus zugunsten wettbewerblicher Förderverfahren nach dem Vorbild von Bundesprogrammen kann dieses Problem mildern. Für Thüringen, das seine Clusterpolitik vor allem mit der Kleinteiligkeit der Unternehmensstruktur
motiviert, wird es jenseits clusterpolitischer Bemühungen darauf ankommen, weiterhin auch direkt die Beseitigung dieser strukturellen Nachteile anzuvisieren, insbesondere durch Rahmenbedingungen, die dem Wachstum der vorhandenen Unternehmen förderlich sind.
Artikel Lesen
Modelling Country Default Risk as a Latent Variable: A Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes Approach
A. Bühn, Stefan Eichler, Dominik Maltritz
Applied Economics,
Nr. 36,
2012
Abstract
We study the determinants of country default risk by applying a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model. This accounts for the fact that country default risk is an unobservable variable. Whereas existing (regression-based) approaches typically use only one of several possible country default risk indicators as the dependent variable, the MIMIC model enables us to consider several indicators at once. The simultaneous consideration of sovereign yield spreads and Standard and Poor (S&P) ratings may help to improve the identification of the latent country default risk. Our results confirm most of the literature's main findings regarding important determinants of country default risk, refute others and provide new evidence to controversial questions.
Artikel Lesen
Government Banking in Russia: Magnitude and New Features
Andrei Vernikov
IWH Discussion Papers,
Nr. 13,
2011
Abstract
State-controlled banks are currently at the core of financial intermediation in Russia. This paper aims to assess the magnitude of government banking, and to reveal some of its special features and arrangements. We distinguish between directly and indirectly state-controlled banks and construct a set of bank-level statistical data covering the period between 2000 and 2011. By January 2011 the market share of state-controlled banks reached almost 54 percent of all bank assets, putting Russia in the same league with China and India and widening the gap from typical European emerging markets. We show that direct state ownership is gradually substituted by indirect ownership and control. It tends to be organized in corporate pyramids that dilute public property, take control away from government bodies, and underpin managerial opportunism. Statecontrolled
banks blur the borderline between commercial banking and development
banking. Dominance of public banks has a bearing on empirical studies whose results might suggest state-owned banks’ greater (or lesser) efficiency or competitiveness compared to other forms of ownership. We tend to interpret such results as influenced by the choice of indicator, period of observations, sample selection, etc., in the absence of an equal playing field for all groups of players. We suggest that the government’s planned retreat from the banking sector will involve non-core assets mainly, whereas control over core institutions will just become more subtle.
Artikel Lesen
