Economic Capability of East German Regions: Results of a Cluster Analysis
Franz Kronthaler
Regional Studies,
No. 6,
2005
Abstract
This paper analyses the economic capability of East German regions compared with West German regions. Based on new growth theory and new economic geography, and using relevant empirical literature, regions are clustered according to a set of growth factors. The clustering results find little evidence that the economic capability of East German regions is already comparable with West German regions. Economic disadvantages are particularly rooted in lower technical progress, a lack of entrepreneurship, lower business and industrial concentration, and a loss of human capital. However, there are a few East German regions with a high economic capability, but even those suffer from economic disadvantages such as lower technical progress, lower industrial activity and a poorer regional accessibility.
Read article
Determinants and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from German Firm-Level Data
Claudia M. Buch, J. Kleinert, A. Lipponer
Economic Policy,
No. 41,
2005
Abstract
Foreign direct investment is an essential aspect of ‘globalization’ yet its empirical determinants are not well understood. What we do know is based either on poor data for a wide range of nations, or good data for the US and Swedish cases. In this paper, we provide evidence on the determinants of the activities of German multinational firms by using a newly available firm-level data set from the Deutsche Bundesbank. The specific goal of this paper is to demonstrate the relative role of country-level and firm-level determinants of foreign direct investment. We focus on three main questions: First, what are the main driving forces of German firms’ multinational activities? Second, is there evidence that sector-level and firm-level factors shape internationalization patterns? Third, is there evidence of agglomeration effects in the foreign activities of German firms? We find that the market access motive for internationalization dominates. Firms move abroad mainly to gain better access to large foreign markets. Cost-saving motives, however, are important for some manufacturing sectors. Our results strongly suggest that firm-level heterogeneity has an important influence on internationalization patterns – as stressed by recent models of international trade. We also find positive agglomeration effects for the activities of German firms that stem from the number of other German firms that are active on a given foreign market. In terms of lessons for economic policy, our results show that lowering barriers to the integration of markets and encouraging the formation of human capital can promote the activities of multinational firms. However, our results related to the heterogeneity of firms and agglomeration tendencies show that it might be difficult to fine-tune policies directed at the exploitation of synergies and at the creation of clusters of foreign firms.
Read article
Firm-Specific Determinants of Productivity Gaps between East and West German Industrial Branches
Johannes Stephan, Karin Szalai
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 183,
2003
Abstract
Industrial productivity levels of formerly socialist economies in Central East Europe (including East Germany) are considerably lower than in the more mature Western economies. This research aims at assessing the reasons for lower productivities at the firm level: what are the firm-specific determinants of productivity gaps. To assess this, we have conducted an extensive field study and focussed on a selection of two important manufacturing industries, namely machinery manufacturers and furniture manufacturers, and on the construction industry. Using the data generated in field work, we test a set of determinant-candidates which were derived from theory and prior research in that topic. Our analysis uses the simplest version of the matched-pair approach, in which first hypothesis about relevant productivity level-determinants are tested. In a second step, positively tested hypothesis are further assessed in terms of whether they also constitute firm-specific determinants of the apparent gaps between the firms in our Eastern and such in our Western panels. Our results suggest that the quality of human capital plays an important role in all three industrial branches assessed. Amongst manufacturing firms, networking activities and the use of modern technologies for communication are important reasons for the lower levels of labour productivity in the East. The intensity of long-term strategic planning on behalf of the management turned out to be relevant only for machinery manufacturers. Product and process innovations unexpectedly exhibit an ambiguous picture, as did the extent of specialisation on a small number of products in the firms’ portfolio and the intensity of competition.
Read article
A Study of the Competitiveness of Regions based on a Cluster Analysis: The Example of East Germany
Franz Kronthaler
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 179,
2003
Abstract
This paper examines whether some East German regions have already achieved the same economic capability as the regions in West Germany, so that they are on a competitive basis with the West German regions and are able to reach the same economic level in the long run. If this is not the case, it is important to know more about the reasons for the economic weakness of the East German regions twelve years after unification.
The study is based on a cluster analysis. Criteria for the cluster formation are several economic indicators, which provide information about the economic capability of regions. The choice of the indicators is based on a review of results of the theoretical and empirical literature on the new growth theory and new economic geography.
The results show that most of the East German regions have not yet reached the economic capability and competitiveness of their West German counterparts so that they - from the viewpoint of the new growth theory and the new economic geography - are not in the position to reach the same economic level. According to these theories economic disadvantages are most notably the consequences of less technical progress, a lack of entrepreneurship and fewer business concentration. Under these points it is especially noteworthy that young well educated people leave these East German regions so that human capital might will turn into a bottle-neck in the near future. Only a few regions in East Germany - those with important agglomerations - are comparable to West German regions that are characterised by average capability and competitiveness, but not to those with above average economic capability and competitiveness. Even those more advanced East German regions still suffer from a slower technical progress.
There are important policy implications based on these results: regional policy in East Germany was not able to assist raising all regions to a sufficient level of competitiveness. It may be more effective to concentrate the regional policy efforts on a selection of important agglomerations. This has also strong implications for the EU regional policy assuming that the accession countries will have similar problems in catching up to the economic level of the EU as have the East German regions.
Read article
Explaining Investment Trends in European Union Countries
Klaus Weyerstraß
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 174,
2003
Abstract
In the 1980s and, in particular, in the 1990s the countries of the European Union experienced divergent developments of gross fixed capital formation. Estimating an investment function for a panel of ten countries and analyzing the paths of the determinants of investment in the countries under consideration reveals that the different development of final demand is the main factor responsible for the divergences in investment. Other factors are disparities in the decline of real interest rates and of relative prices for capital goods.
Read article
Innovative and international – with local personnel: Results of a survey of New Economy enterprises in Saxony and Thuringia
Cornelia Lang, Ralf Müller
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 12,
2001
Abstract
Die befragten Unternehmen, die alle aus den Branchen Biotechnologie und Informationstechnologie stammen, sind in ihrer großen Mehrheit innovativ und auf überregionalen und internationalen Märkten tätig. Dabei stützen sie sich weitestgehend auf in der unmittelbaren Umgebung angeworbene Fachkräfte, deren Vorhandensein vor allem aus der modernen Wissenschaftsinfrastruktur der neuen Länder resultiert. Dem entsprechend sind die Unternehmen auch optimistisch, für geplantes Unternehmenswachstum genügend Personal zu finden. Die Green Card spielt dafür keine wesentliche Rolle.
Read article
New trend in education structure of East-West migration?
Wolfram Kempe
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 9,
2001
Abstract
Eine Analyse der Bildungsstruktur der Migranten auf Basis der Daten des SOEP ergibt Anzeichen, dass sich die bis 1997 beobachteten positiven Wanderungssalden bei Personen mit hohen Bildungsabschlüssen seit 1998 in ihr Gegenteil verkehrt haben. Während für die Zuwanderer aus den alten Bundesländern keine wesentlichen Strukturveränderungen festzustellen sind, hat sich der Anteil der Höchstqualifizierten bei den Abwanderern aus Ostdeutschland gegenüber dem Zeitraum 1992-1997 verdoppelt. Außerdem werden Aussagen über Umfang und Altersstruktur der Migration gemacht.
Read article
Human Capital and Transformation - The example of the new Länder -
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 138,
2001
Abstract
Read article
Human capital in transformation – The example of the new Länder
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 126,
2000
Abstract
Zwischen der Humankapitalausstattung und der Produktivität von Volkswirtschaften gibt es einen engen Zusammenhang. Folglich könnte für die Erklärung der Produktivi-tätslücke zwischen den alten und neuen Ländern neben anderen Faktoren auch Unter-schiede in der Ausstattung mit Humankapital eine Rolle spielen. Die Analyse zeigt je-doch, dass Humankapitalnachteile der neuen Länder nach 1990 weitgehend auf im Ar-beitsprozess gebildetes Wissen beschränkt waren, die im Zeitverlauf an Bedeutung ver-loren. Für im formalen Bildungssystem (Schulen, Universitäten) gebildetes Humankapi-tal bestand dagegen schon zu Beginn der Transformation ein hohes Niveau, das gegen-über den alten Ländern bis heute eher Vorteile aufweist. Letztlich erweist sich das Hu-mankapital für die neuen Länder eher als ein nachfrageseitiges denn als ein angebotssei-tiges Problem. Dies gründet auf der Branchen- und Unternehmensstruktur der neuen Länder, die im Vergleich zu den alten Ländern geringe Qualifikationsansprüche stellt.
Read article
Education structure of East-West migration: East Germany's human capital outflow stopped
Wolfram Kempe
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 15,
1999
Abstract
War die Binnenmigration zwischen Ost- und Westdeutschland von 1989 bis 1991 durch eine überproportionale Abwanderung mittlerer und hoher Bildungsabschlüsse aus Ostdeutschland gekennzeichnet, so hat sich das Bild danach deutlich gewandelt. Seither wandern zwar noch immer überwiegend junge und gut ausgebildete Personen von Ost- nach Westdeutschland, jedoch ist dies auch bei der inzwischen bedeutenden Zahl der Umzüge in der Gegenrichtung der Fall. Der Saldo der Wanderungen von Personen mit einem (Fach-)Hochschulabschluß ist für Ost-deutschland seit 1992 sogar positiv.
Read article
