Works Councils and Separations: Voice, Monopoly, and Insurance Effects
Boris Hirsch, Thorsten Schank, Claus Schnabel
Industrial Relations,
No. 4,
2010
Abstract
Using a large linked employer–employee data set for Germany, we find that the existence of a works council is associated with a lower separation rate to employment, in particular for workers with low tenure. While works council monopoly effects show up in all specifications, clear voice effects are only visible for low tenured workers. Works councils also reduce separations to nonemployment, and this impact is more pronounced for men. Insurance effects only show up for workers with tenure of more than 2 years. Our results indicate that works councils to some extent represent the interests of a specific clientele.
Read article
Do Banks Benefit from Internationalization? Revisiting the Market Power-Risk Nexus
Claudia M. Buch, C. T. Koch, Michael Koetter
Abstract
Recent developments on international financial markets have called the benefits of
bank globalization into question. Large, internationally active banks have
acquired substantial market power, and international activities have not
necessarily made banks less risky. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the
actual link between bank internationalization, bank risk, and market power.
Analyzing this link is the purpose of this paper. We jointly estimate the
determinants of risk and market power of banks, and we analyze the effects of
changes in terms of the number of foreign countries (the extensive margin) and
the volume of foreign assets (the intensive margin). Our paper has four main
findings. First, there is a strong negative feedback effect between risk and market
power. Second, banks with higher shares of foreign assets, in particular those held
through foreign branches, have higher market power at home. Third, holding
assets in a large number of foreign countries tends to increase bank risk. Fourth,
the impact of internationalization differs across banks from different banking
groups and of different size.
Read article
The Dilemma of Delegating Search: Budgeting in Public Employment Services
Martin Altemeyer-Bartscher, J. T. Addison, T. Kuhn
IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5170,
No. 5170,
2010
Abstract
The poor performance often attributed to many public employment services may be explained in part by a delegation problem between the central office and local job centers. In markets characterized by frictions, job centers function as match-makers, linking job seekers with relevant vacancies. Because their search intensity in contacting employers and collecting data is not verifiable by the central authority, a typical moral hazard problem can arise. To overcome the delegation problem and provide high-powered incentives for high levels of search effort on the part of job centers, we propose output-related schemes that assign greater staff capacity to agencies achieving high strike rates.
Read article
FDI and Domestic Investment: An Industry-level View
C. Arndt, Claudia M. Buch, Monika Schnitzer
B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy,
2010
Abstract
Previous empirical work on the link between domestic and foreign investment has provided mixed results. This may partly be due to the level of aggregation of the data. In this paper, we argue that the impact of FDI on the domestic capital stock depends on the structure of industries. Using industry-level data on the stock of German FDI, we test our predictions. We use panel cointegration methods which address the potential endogeneity of FDI. We find evidence for a positive long-run impact of FDI on the domestic capital stock.
Read article
Differences in Labor Supply to Monopsonistic Firms and the Gender Pay Gap: An Empirical Analysis Using Linked Employer‐Employee Data from Germany
Boris Hirsch, Thorsten Schank, Claus Schnabel
Journal of Labor Economics,
No. 2,
2010
Abstract
This article investigates women’s and men’s labor supply to the firm within a semistructural approach based on a dynamic model of new monopsony. Using methods of survival analysis and a large linked employer‐employee data set for Germany, we find that labor supply elasticities are small (1.9–3.7) and that women’s labor supply to the firm is less elastic than men’s (which is the reverse of gender differences in labor supply usually found at the level of the market). Our results imply that at least one‐third of the gender pay gap might be wage discrimination by profit‐maximizing monopsonistic employers.
Read article
Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence
Boris Hirsch
Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems,
No. 639,
2010
Abstract
This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women’s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women’s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men’s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.
Read article
Innovation and Skills from a Sectoral Perspective: A Linked Employer-Employee Analysis
Lutz Schneider, Jutta Günther, Bianca Brandenburg
Economics of Innovation and New Technology,
2010
Abstract
Natur- und ingenieurwissenschaftliche Fähigkeiten sowie Management- und Führungskompetenzen werden häufig als Quelle von betrieblichen Innovationsaktivitäten betrachtet. Der vorliegende Artikel untersucht die Rolle von Humankapital im Sinne des formalen Bildungsabschlusses und des tatsächlich ausgeübten Berufes für die betriebliche Innovationstätigkeit im Rahmen eines Probit-Ansatzes, wobei zwischen sektoralen Innovationsregimen unterschieden wird. Die Analyse basiert auf einem Mikrodatensatz deutscher Betriebe (LIAB), welcher detaillierte Informationen über die Innovationsaktivitäten und die Qualifikation der Beschäftigten, verstanden als formaler Ausbildungsabschluss, ausgeübter Beruf und Erfahrung, enthält. Es zeigen sich signifikante Unterschiede der Humankapitalausstattung zwischen Sektoren, welche nach der Pavitt-Klassifikation unterschieden wurden. Sektoren mit einem hohen Anteil hochqualifizierter Beschäftigter sind überdurchschnittlich oft unter den Produktinnovatoren zu finden (spezialisierte Zulieferer und wissenschaftsbezogene Branchen). Indes lassen sich in den realisierten Regressionen keine signifikant positiven Effekte der Beschäftigtenqualifikation auf die Innovationstätigkeit eines Betriebes nachweisen.
Read article
Openness and Income Disparities: Does Trade Explain The 'Mezzogiorno' Effect?
Claudia M. Buch, P. Monti
Review of World Economics,
No. 4,
2010
Abstract
We use Italian regional data to answer the question whether trade affects within-country income differentials. In Italy, the more affluent Northern regions trade more with the rest of the world than the poorer ones in the Southern “Mezzogiorno” regions. Prima facie, there is a positive correlation between external trade and per capita income. Studying this relationship empirically requires taking into account the endogenous component of trade. We argue that panel cointegration models can complement instrumental variables techniques to account for the endogeneity of trade in a panel context. Both methods show a positive link between trade openness and the level of income per capita.
Read article
Produktivität – Alters- vs. Erfahrungseffekte
Lutz Schneider
Alterung und Arbeitsmarkt. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung 2007. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Demographie, Band 3,
2008
Abstract
Angesichts der sich abzeichnenden Alterung der Erwerbsfähigen in Deutschland sowie der unzureichenden Arbeitsmarktchancen Älterer stellt sich die Frage, welchen Einfluss das Lebensalter, aber auch die akkumulierte Erfahrung auf die Produktivität von Beschäftigten ausübt. Kognitionswissenschaftliche Ansätze sprechen für negative Alterseffekte, welche durch die mit dem Alter verbundenen Erfahrungsgewinne – zumindest teilweise – kompensiert werden können. Zur Überprüfung dieser These wird der Linked-Employer-Employee-Datensatz des Instituts für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (LIAB) herangezogen. Auf der Basis einer betrieblichen Produktionsfunktion wird mittels regressionsanalytischer Methoden getestet, ob und wie sich Alter und Erfahrung der Beschäftigten eines Betriebs auf dessen Produktivität auswirken. Die Analyse beschränkt sich auf das Verarbeitende Gewerbe, es wird zwischen Lowtech- und Hightech-Sektor unterschieden.
Die realisierten Schätzungen für den Zeitraum von 2000 bis 2003 liefern klare Belege für einen umgekehrt u-förmigen Alters-Produktivitäts-Verlauf. Die mittlere Gruppe der 30- bis 50-Jährigen erbringt den höchsten, die Gruppe der über 50-Jährigen den geringsten Produktivitätsbeitrag. Erfahrungsakkumulation fördert die Leistung, indes zeigt sich, dass dieser Effekt zu schwach ist, um die negativen Alterseffekte zu kompensieren.
Read article
Does Export Openness Increase Firm-level Output Volatility?
Claudia M. Buch, Jörg Döpke, H. Strotmann
World Economy,
No. 4,
2009
Abstract
There is a widespread concern that increased trade may lead to increased instability and thus risk at the firm level. Greater export openness can indeed affect firm-level volatility by changing the exposure and the reaction of firms to macroeconomic developments. The net effect is ambiguous from a theoretical point of view. This paper provides firm-level evidence on the link between openness and volatility. Using comprehensive data on more than 21,000 German manufacturing firms for the period 1980–2001, we analyse the evolution of firm-level output volatility and the link between volatility and export openness. Our paper has three main findings. First, firm-level output volatility is significantly higher than the level of aggregate volatility, but it displays similar patterns. Second, increased export openness lowers firm-level output volatility. This effect is primarily driven by variations along the extensive margin, i.e. by the distinction between exporters and non-exporters. Variations along the intensive margin, i.e. the volume of exports, tend to have a dampening impact on volatility as well. Third, small firms are more volatile than large firms.
Read article