EU Accession Countries’ Specialisation Patterns in Foreign Trade and Domestic Production - What can we infer for catch-up prospects?
Johannes Stephan
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 184,
2003
Abstract
This paper supplements prior analysis on ‘patterns and prospects’ (Stephan, 2003) in which prospects for the speed of future productivity growth were assessed by looking at the specialisation patterns in domestic production. This analysis adds the foreign trade sphere to the results generated in the prior analysis. The refined results are broadly in line with the results from the original analysis, indicating the robustness of our methods applied in either analysis. The most prominent results pertain to Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. Those two countries appear to be best suited for swift productivity catch-up from the viewpoint of sectoral specialisation. Poland and Estonia exhibit the lowest potentials. Only for the case of Poland would results suggest bleak prospects.
Read article
Evolving Structural Patterns in the Enlarging European Division of Labour: Sectoral and Branch Specialisation and the Potentials for Closing the Productivity Gap
Johannes Stephan
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 5,
2003
Abstract
This report summarises the results generated in empirical analysis within a larger EU 5th FP RTD-project on the determinants of productivity gaps between the current EU-15 and accession states in Central East Europe. The focus of research in this part of the project is on sectoral specialisation patterns emerging as a result of intensifying integration between the current EU and a selection of six newly acceding economies, namely Estonia, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary and Slovenia. The research-leading question is concerned with the role played by the respective specialisation patterns for (i) the explanation of observed productivity gaps and for (ii) the projection of future potentials of productivity growth in Central East Europe.
For the aggregated level, analysis determines the share of national productivity gaps accountable to acceding countries’ particular sectoral patterns, and their role for aggregate productivity growth: in Poland, the Slovak Republic and Hungary, sectoral shares of national productivity gaps are considerable and might evolve into a ‘barrier’ to productivity catch-up.Moreover, past productivity growth was dominated by a downward adjustment in employment rather than structural change. With the industrial sector of manufacturing having been identified as the main source of national productivity gaps and growth, the subsequent analysis focuses on the role of industrial specialisation patterns and develops an empirical model to project future productivity growth potentials. Each chapter closes with some policy conclusions.
Read article
FDI Subsidiaries and Industrial Integration of Central Europe: Conceptual and Empirical Results
Boris Majcen, Slavo Radosevic, Matija Rojec
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 177,
2003
Abstract
Read article
Vertical and horizontal patterns of intra-industry trade between EU and candidate countries
Hubert Gabrisch
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 2,
2003
Abstract
Trade between the European Union (EU) and the Transition Economies (TE) is increasingly characterised by intra-industry trade. The decomposition of intra-industry trade into horizontal and vertical shares reveals predominantly vertical structures with decisively more quality advantages for the EU and less quality advantages for TE countries whenever trade has been liberalised. Empirical research on factors determining this structure in a EU-TE framework lags behind theoretical and empirical research on horizontal and vertical trade in other regions of the world. The main objective of this paper is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate on EU-TE trade structures by offering an explanation of vertical trade. We utilise a cross-country approach in which relative wage differences, country size and income distribution play a leading role. We find first that relative differences in wages (per capita income) and country size explain intraindustry trade when trade is vertical and completely liberalised, and second that crosscountry differences in income distribution play no explanatory role. We conclude that EU firms have been able to increase their product quality and to shift low-quality segments to TE countries. This may suggest a product-quality cycle prevalent in EU-TE trade.
Read article
Innovation cooperation in East Germany - only a half-way success?
Jutta Günther
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 170,
2003
Abstract
The paper focuses on the question whether enterprises that engage in innovation cooperation with external partners are more innovative and thus more productive than non-cooperating firms. A comparison between East and West Germany is being made. It shows that cooperating enterprises in East and West Germany are indeed more innovative than non-cooperating firms, but there remains a clear productivity gap between East and West German cooperating firms. Furthermore, in East Germany - different from West Germany - non-cooperating firms are even more productive than cooperating firms.
Read article
Intra-industry trade and the productivity gap in the enlarged EU
Hubert Gabrisch
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 16,
2002
Abstract
Der Handel der EU mit den zehn Kandidatenländern Mittel- und Osteuropas wird durch vertikale Strukturen bestimmt. Dabei besitzen die Produzenten in den EU-Ländern einen Vorteil in der Produktion von Gütern höherer Qualität. Umfangreiche Direktinvestitionen in die Kandidatenländer haben offensichtlich die Überlegenheit der EU-Produzenten in der angewendeten Technologie, in der Sachkapital- und Humankapitalausstattung nicht verringert. Damit bleibt auch die Produktivitätslücke zwischen EU und Kandidatenländern bestehen. Dieses Phänomen kann damit erklärt werden, dass die Produktion von gleichen Gütern mit niedrigerer Qualität in die Kandidatenländer verlegt wird, während die Produktion einer höheren Qualität in der EU verbleibt und ausgebaut wird. Der Test dieser Hypothese mit dem Modell eines Produkt-Qualität- Zyklus erbringt dafür Hinweise.
Read article
Intra-industry trade between European Union and Transition Economies. Does income distribution matter?
Hubert Gabrisch, Maria Luigia Segnana
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 155,
2002
Abstract
EU-TE trade is increasingly characterised by intra-industry trade. For some countries (Czech Republic), the share of intra-industry trade in total trade with the EU approaches 60 percent. The decomposition of intra-industry trade into horizontal and vertical shares reveals overwhelming vertical structures with strong quality advantages for the EU and shrinking quality advantages for TE countries wherever trade has been liberalised. Empirical research on factors determining this structure in an EU-TE framework has lagged theoretical and empirical research on horizontal trade and vertical trade in other regions of the world. The main objective of this paper is, therefore, to contribute to the ongoing debate over EU-TE trade structures, by offering an explanation of intra-industry trade. We utilize a cross-country approach in which relative wage differences and country size play a leading role. In addition, as implied by a model of the productquality
cycle, we examine income distribution factors as determinates of the emerging
EU-TE structure of trade flows. Using OLS regressions, we find first, that relative
differences in wages (per capita income) and country size explain intra-industry trade, when trade is vertical and completely liberalized and second, that cross country differences in income distribution play no explanatory role. We conclude that if increasing wage differences resulted from an increasing productivity gap between highquality and low-quality industries, then vertical structures will, over the long-term create significant barriers for the increase in TE incomes and lowering EU-TE income differentials.
Read article
Network activities and the productivity gap in East Germany: The role of agglomeration advantages
Anita Wölfl, Joachim Ragnitz
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 13,
2001
Abstract
Ausgehend von theoretischen Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang von Produktivität und Netzwerkaktivitäten von Unternehmen wird untersucht, inwieweit ostdeutsche Unternehmen sich in derartige Netzwerke haben integrieren können und inwieweit dies produktivitätserhöhend wirkt. Die Netzwerkeinbindung wird dabei durch den Agglomerationsgrad der Standortregionen der Unternehmen operationalisiert. Ergebnis ist, daß derartige Netzwerke in Ostdeutschland nur schwach ausgeprägt sind. Überdies ist ein “kritischer“ Agglomerationsgrad, von dem an ein positiver Einfluß auf das Produktivitätsniveau festgestellt werden kann, in Ostdeutschland noch längst nicht erreicht.
Read article
Methods of estimating the overall economic production potential and the productivity gap
Klaus Weyerstraß
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 142,
2001
Abstract
Für die wirtschaftspolitischen Instanzen stellt die Kenntnis des Produktionspotentials und des daraus abgeleiteten gesamtwirtschaftlichen Kapazitätsauslastungsgrades eine wichtige Orientierungsgröße dar. In diesem Diskussionspapier werden verschiedene Methoden der Schätzung des Produktionspotentials dargestellt. Diese umfassen Unternehmensbefragungen, reine Zeitreihenmethoden und Verfahren, die explizit die ökonomische Theorie berücksichtigen. Hier ist insbesondere der Produktionsfunktions-Ansatz zu nennen. Abschließend werden einige der vorgestellten Schätzmethoden auf Daten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland angewandt.
Read article
