The influence of Vertical Integration and Property Rights on Network Access Charges in the German Electricity Markets
Christian Growitsch, Thomas Wein
Externe Publikationen,
No. 6,
2004
Abstract
German Electricity markets were deregulated in the late nineties of the last century. In contrast to other European countries, the German government enacted negotiated third party access instead of installing a regulation authority. Network access charges for new competitors are based on contractual arrangements between energy producers and industrial consumers, which specify the calculation schemes for access charges. Local and regional suppliers are nevertheless able to set (monopolistic) charges at their own discretion, restricted only by the possibility of interference competition authorities. While some of those suppliers have been acquired by one of the four Transmission System Operators and become vertically integrated, the majority is still independent public utility companies. In this paper we analyse if there is evidence for different charging behaviour depending on the supplier’s economic independence or its level of vertical integration. Controlling for other coefficients as the so called structural features and related cost differences as well as the influence of competition law suits, multivariate estimations show significantly lower access charges than vertically separated suppliers, whereas incorporated network operators charge significantly higher charges compared to independent suppliers for at least one typical case.
Read article
Technological capability of foreign and West German investors in East Germany
Jutta Günther
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 189,
2004
Abstract
Foreign direct investment (FDI) plays an important role for countries or regions in the process of economic catching-up since it is assumed – among other things – that FDI brings in new production technology and knowledge. This paper gives an overview about the development of FDI in East Germany based on official data provided by the Federal Bank of Germany. The investigation also includes a comparison of FDI in East Germany to Central East European countries. But the main focus of the paper is an analysis of the technological capability comparing majority foreign and West German owned firms to majority East German owned firms. It shows that foreign and West German subsidiaries in East Germany are indeed characterized by superior technological capability with respect to all indicators looked at (product innovation, research & development, organizational changes etc.).
Read article
Current Trends - IWH barometer for economic activity - East German economy had a good start in the new year
Udo Ludwig
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 3,
2004
Abstract
Im vergangenen Jahr hat sich die wirtschaftliche Aktivität in den neuen Bundesländern geringfügig stärker erhöht als zuletzt laut IWH-Konjunkturbarometer vorausgesagt worden. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt stieg laut erster amtlicher Schätzung im Jahresdurchschnitt um 0,4%, wohingegen es in den alten Ländern um 0,2% schrumpfte. Zugleich hat der Arbeitskreis VGR der Länder neue Berechnungen für die Jahre 1999 bis 2002 vorgelegt.
Read article
Advances in macroeconometric modeling: Papers and Proceedings of the 3rd IWH Workshop in Macroeconometrics
Christian Dreger
Schriften des IWH,
No. 15,
2004
Abstract
This volume contains the contributions to the 4th Workshop of the Halle Institute for Economic Research IWH (www.iwh-halle.de) in macroeconometrics held in November 2003. The workshop takes place every year and is especially designed for the presentation of new work in the field of applied research.
Read article
Investment, Financial Markets, New Economy Dynamics and Growth in Transition Countries
Albrecht Kauffmann, P. J. J. Welfens
Economic Opening Up and Growth in Russia: Finance, Trade, Market Institutions, and Energy,
2004
Abstract
The transition to a market economy in the former CMEA area is more than a decade old and one can clearly distinguish a group of relatively fast growing countries — including Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia — and a majority of slowly growing economies, including Russia and the Ukraine. Initial problems of transition were natural in the sense that systemic transition to a market economy has effectively destroyed part of the existing capital stock that was no longer profitable under the new relative prices imported from world markets; and there was a transitory inflationary push as low state-administered prices were replaced by higher market equilibrium prices. Indeed, systemic transformation in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union have brought serious transitory inflation problems and a massive transition recession; negative growth rates have continued over many years in some countries, including Russia and the Ukraine, where output growth was negative throughout the 1990s (except for Russia, which recorded slight growth in 1997). For political and economic reasons the economic performance of Russia is of particular relevance for the success of the overall transition process. If Russia would face stagnation and instability, this would undermine political and economic stability in the whole of Europe and prospects for integrating Russia into the world economy.
Read article
A Study of the Competitiveness of Regions based on a Cluster Analysis: The Example of East Germany
Franz Kronthaler
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 179,
2003
Abstract
This paper examines whether some East German regions have already achieved the same economic capability as the regions in West Germany, so that they are on a competitive basis with the West German regions and are able to reach the same economic level in the long run. If this is not the case, it is important to know more about the reasons for the economic weakness of the East German regions twelve years after unification.
The study is based on a cluster analysis. Criteria for the cluster formation are several economic indicators, which provide information about the economic capability of regions. The choice of the indicators is based on a review of results of the theoretical and empirical literature on the new growth theory and new economic geography.
The results show that most of the East German regions have not yet reached the economic capability and competitiveness of their West German counterparts so that they - from the viewpoint of the new growth theory and the new economic geography - are not in the position to reach the same economic level. According to these theories economic disadvantages are most notably the consequences of less technical progress, a lack of entrepreneurship and fewer business concentration. Under these points it is especially noteworthy that young well educated people leave these East German regions so that human capital might will turn into a bottle-neck in the near future. Only a few regions in East Germany - those with important agglomerations - are comparable to West German regions that are characterised by average capability and competitiveness, but not to those with above average economic capability and competitiveness. Even those more advanced East German regions still suffer from a slower technical progress.
There are important policy implications based on these results: regional policy in East Germany was not able to assist raising all regions to a sufficient level of competitiveness. It may be more effective to concentrate the regional policy efforts on a selection of important agglomerations. This has also strong implications for the EU regional policy assuming that the accession countries will have similar problems in catching up to the economic level of the EU as have the East German regions.
Read article
Die New Economic Geography - besser als ihr Ruf
Rupert Kawka
Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,
2003
Abstract
Read article
Macroeconomic Modelling of the German Economy in the Framework of Euroland
Rüdiger Pohl, Heinz P. Galler
Schriften des IWH,
No. 11,
2002
Abstract
An attempt to develop a new macroeconometric model for Germany is confronted with several questions that range from the general rationality of such an approach to specific problems of an appropriate model structure. One important aspect of this discussion is the introduction of the Euro as a common currency of the European monetary union. This institutional change may result in structural breaks due to changing behavior of economic agents. In addition, the definition of the spatial unit that is appropriate for modelling becomes a problem. Additional problems come from the introduction of the European Single Market and the increasing international economic integration not only within the European union but also beyond its borders. And in the case of Germany, the unification of the West and the East demand special attention. Last but not least, the harmonization of national accounting for the member states of the European Union has to be dealt with. Thus, the introduction of the Euro as a common currency is just one problem besides others that must be addressed.
Read article
A glimpse on sectoral convergence of productivity levels
Gerald Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 133,
2001
Abstract
This paper examines the presence of sectoral convergence of labor productivity between 14 OECD countries. Using the OECD International Sectoral Data Base (ISDB), the paper looks at the developments within 12 distinct sectors during the period 1970-1995. The change of the coefficients of variance suggests that there is strong sectoral convergence within most service sectors while the evidence of convergence for Manufacturing as well as for Communication is rather weak. These findings are in line with most studies undertaken on this subject so far. It is concluded that economic theories at hand to explain growth and convergence (or divergence respectively) are of different importance for the sectors concerned. While models of the New Growth Theory seemed to be useful to explain growth mechanisms within Manufacturing and Communication, traditional models seemed to apply to most other sectors.
Read article
Differences in productivity and convergence of economic regions – The example of the New Länder -
Gerald Müller, Joachim Ragnitz, Anita Wölfl
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 3,
2001
Abstract
Auch im Jahre 2000 liegt das Produktivitätsniveau, das im Durchschnitt der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft erreicht wird, bei nur etwa zwei Dritteln des westdeutschen Wertes. Zwar gibt es eine erhebliche Differenzierung nach Unternehmen, nach Branchen und nach Regionen. Im Ganzen stellen die neuen Länder aber noch immer eine strukturschwache Region dar, und es ist offenkundig, dass das Ziel einer Angleichung der Pro-Kopf-Einkommen an das Westniveau kurzfristig nicht erreicht werden kann.
Die Frage, weshalb das Produktivitätsniveau in der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft weiterhin deutlich niedriger liegt als in Westdeutschland, ist auch 10 Jahre nach der deutschen Vereinigung noch nicht abschließend geklärt. In der Literatur gibt es zwar inzwischen eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlich gut begründeter Hypothesen, mit denen der Produktivitätsrückstand auf verschiedene betriebsinterne und -externe Faktoren zurückgeführt werden soll. Eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung fehlt aber bislang noch. Auch die Frage, welche Schlussfolgerungen angesichts des anhaltend niedrigen Produktivitätsniveaus für den weiteren Konvergenzprozess zu ziehen sind, ist noch nicht überzeugend beantwortet.
Angesichts dieser Forschungsdefizite hat das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie mit Schreiben vom 29. April 1998 das Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle beauftragt, im Rahmen der sektoralen Strukturberichterstattung das Thema „Produktivitätsunterschiede und Konvergenz von Wirtschaftsräumen – Das Beispiel der neuen Länder“ zu bearbeiten. Das IWH legt hiermit den Abschlussbericht zu diesem Projekt vor.
Read article
