Search Results

All
Data Type
Topic
Year
Refresh

EFN Report Spring 2016: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2016 and 2017

EFN Reports, No. 2, 2016
Abstract
Global growth will stay rather moderate this year. The peak of the upswing in the US appears to be over. For Japan, after three years of “Abenomics”, a prolonged upswing is still elusive. In China low profitability and high debt levels of many government-owned industrial firms continue to drag growth down. The low prices for commodities heighten uncertainty and volatility on financial markets since they increase the risks of financial crises in economies that are dependent on commodity exports. In the euro area, chances for the recovery to continue are good, as this year, like in 2015, oil prices will probably be markedly lower than they were a year ago, supporting real income of private households and lowering production costs of firms. In this context, our forecast is that euro area GDP will expand by 1.6% in 2016 and by 1.7% in 2017. These rates are higher than the rate of potential growth, but they are arguably low given the expansive monetary policy and the strong stimulus from decreased commodity prices. We do not expect an increase in euro area inflation during 2016, but prices will grow by around 1% in 2017, because the dampening effects of decreasing energy prices slowly fade off and the euro remains rather weak. However, risks for this cautiously optimistic forecast are substantial. New shadows on the financial sector, the uncertainty about whether or not the British will vote in favour of membership in the European Union and the lack of a viable political solution for the refugee crisis are some of the main uncertainties behind these forecasts.
Read article

EFN Report Spring 2015: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2015 and 2016

EFN Reports, No. 2, 2015
Abstract
Recent movements on world markets for commodities, currencies and capital stimulate the world economy, but they entail also considerable risks: income losses of energy exporting countries might trigger financial crises with worldwide repercussions; crises might also emerge from financial distress of emerging market debtors with liabilities denominated in US dollars. Extremely low interest rates might not only trigger stock and bond price booms, but also more volatility if investors become fearful of financial bubbles. Quite a few conditions are highly beneficial for a recovery of the euro area economy: governments and large corporations benefit from ultra-low bond yields, banks’ composite costs of debt financing have been converging during the past two years to very low levels, and borrowing costs for non-financial corporations have come down markedly. Prices for stocks, bonds and (on average) houses have gone up. Real disposable incomes of private households have risen due to oil prices. The real effective exchange rate is about 10% lower in March 2015 than it was a year ago, strengthening the price competitiveness of firms in the euro area. According to our forecasts, the euro area GDP will grow by 1.6% in 2015 and by 2.1% in 2016. Structural impediments, however, still limit the ability of the euro area economy to grow strongly: firms and, in particular, private households are only slowly reducing their heavy debt burdens, and confidence will not fully come back in France and Italy, as long as reform processes are inconclusive in both countries and as long as unemployment is not coming down markedly. Our inflation forecast for 2015 is 0.1%, with the possibility of a mild deflation not excluded. In 2016 inflation will increase up to 1.3%, still clearly below the 2% ECB’s target. This calls for continued monetary expansion, though its effects could be limited in the absence of a complementary fiscal stimulus, in particular in those countries where the implementation of structural reforms brings long term gains but short term losses.
Read article

EFN Report Winter 2014/15: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2015 and 2016

EFN Reports, No. 1, 2015
Abstract
At the beginning of the year 2015 crude oil is, with little more than 50 dollars per barrel (Brent), about 50% cheaper than in the summer 2014. The oil price hike is a stimulus for the whole world economy, even though the gains of energy users are matched by losses of the suppliers: oil producing countries frequently run high current account surpluses vis-à-vis the rest of the world. It is therefore plausible to assume that, reacting to the redistribution of incomes, the oil user countries will increase their spending by more than what will be lost in spending by producers. Investment activity in the euro area has recently been particularly weak. Remarkably, investment in Greece, Portugal, and Spain, i.e. in countries that had to accept international support during the euro crisis, has strengthened. The setback took place in the so-called core countries, including Germany. Consumption growth was also subdued. Lower oil prices, by increasing real incomes of consumers and lowering production costs for firms, should increase private consumption and, in particular, investment. Moreover, the depreciation of the euro will favour exports. Overall, according to our forecasts, the euro area GDP will grow by 1.3% in 2015 and by 1.6% in 2016. GDP growth is about 0.3 percentage points higher due to the impact of lower oil prices in 2015. However, these forecasts are subject to substantial uncertainty, and we do not see any significant reduction of the unemployment rate during the forecasting horizon. Our inflation forecast for 2015 is 0.3%, with the possibility of a mild deflation not excluded. In 2016 inflation will increase up to 1.1%, still clearly below the 2% ECB’s target. This calls for further monetary expansion, though its effects could be limited in the absence of a complementary fiscal stimulus. The expansionary cyclical policies should be combined with more structural reforms to enhance the competitiveness of the euro area and its growth potential, which in our forecasts remains quite limited. In fact, we expect potential output to grow by only 0.4% both in 2015 and 2016.
Read article

Gauging the Effects of Fiscal Stimulus Packages in the Euro Area

Mathias Trabandt, Roland Straub, Günter Coenen
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, No. 2, 2013
Abstract
We seek to quantify the impact on euro area GDP of the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP) enacted in response to the financial crisis of 2008–2009. To do so, we estimate an extended version of the ECB's New Area-Wide Model with a richly specified fiscal sector. The estimation results point to the existence of important complementarities between private and government consumption and, to a lesser extent, between private and public capital. We first examine the implied present-value multipliers for seven distinct fiscal instruments and show that the estimated complementarities result in fiscal multipliers larger than one for government consumption and investment. We highlight the importance of monetary accommodation for these findings. We then show that the EERP, if implemented as initially enacted, had a sizeable, although short-lived impact on euro area GDP. Since the EERP comprised both revenue and expenditure-based fiscal stimulus measures, the total multiplier is below unity.
Read article

Effects of Fiscal Stimulus in Structural Models

Mathias Trabandt, Günter Coenen, Christopher J. Erceg, Charles Freedman, Davide Furceri, Michael Kumhof, René Lalonde, Douglas Laxton, Jesper Lindé, Annabelle Mourougane, Dirk Muir, Susanna Mursula, Carlos de Resende, John Roberts, Werner Roeger, Stephen Snudden, Jan in't Veld
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, No. 1, 2012
Abstract
The paper subjects seven structural DSGE models, all used heavily by policymaking institutions, to discretionary fiscal stimulus shocks using seven different fiscal instruments, and compares the results to those of two prominent academic DSGE models. There is considerable agreement across models on both the absolute and relative sizes of different types of fiscal multipliers. The size of many multipliers is large, particularly for spending and targeted transfers. Fiscal policy is most effective if it has moderate persistence and if monetary policy is accommodative. Permanently higher spending or deficits imply significantly lower initial multipliers.
Read article

Fiscal Spending Multiplier Calculations based on Input-Output Tables – with an Application to EU Members

Toralf Pusch, A. Rannberg
IWH Discussion Papers, No. 1, 2011
published in: Intervention. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies
Abstract
Fiscal spending multiplier calculations have been revived in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Much of the current literature is based on VAR estimation methods and DSGE models. The aim of this paper is not a further deepening of this literature but rather to implement a calculation method of multipliers which is suitable for open economies like EU member states. To this end, Input-Output tables are used as by this means the import intake of domestic demand components can be isolated in order to get an appropriate base for the calculation of the relevant import quotas. The difference of this method is substantial – on average the calculated multipliers are 15% higher than the conventional GDP fiscal spending multiplier for EU members. Multipliers for specific spending categories are comparably high, ranging between 1.4 and 1.8 for many members of the EU. GDP drops due to budget consolidation might therefore be substantial if monetary policy is not able to react in an expansionary manner.
Read article

What are the Long-Term Benefits of the Economic Stimulus Package II for German Local Governments? – The Case of Saxony

Peter Haug
Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 4, 2010
Abstract
Der Beitrag untersucht, ob von den im Rahmen des Konjunkturpakets II geförderten Investitionen neben den kurzfristigen Nachfrageeffekten auch langfristige Auswirkungen z. B. auf das lokale Wirtschaftswachstum zu erwarten sind. Was die kurzfristigen Auswirkungen betrifft, so zeigte sich am Beispiel Sachsens mit relativ geringfügiger zeitlicher Verzögerung ein Anstieg der kommunalen Investitionen. Das Time-Lag-Problem staatlicher Ausgabenprogramme scheint sich dort in Grenzen zu halten. Erhebliche Preissteigerungen für Bauleistungen zeichnen sich bisher ebenfalls noch nicht ab. Mit Bezug auf die langfristigen Wirkungen der geförderten Maßnahmen ist aus Sicht z. B. der Neuen Wachstumstheorie Skepsis angebracht, da selbst bei typischen öffentlichen Vorleistungsgütern die Entzugseffekte der Finanzierung gegen die Produktivitätssteigerung im privaten Unternehmenssektor abzuwägen sind. Hinzu kommen generell die Faktorpreiseffekte von Investitionszuweisungen, die einen übermäßigen Einsatz von physischem Kapital in der öffentlichen Produktion begünstigen. Diese skeptische Haltung der Theorie wird für Sachsen dadurch bestärkt, dass vor allem kommunale Konsumgüter (Sport- und Freizeitanlagen) oder nicht unmittelbar wirtschaftsnahe Bildungseinrichtungen (Kindergärten, Grundschulen) gefördert werden. Investitionen etwa in Einrichtungen der beruflichen Bildung, Forschung und Entwicklung oder unternehmensrelevante Infrastrukturarten spielen entweder auf kommunaler Ebene keine nennenswerte Rolle oder sind explizit von der Förderung ausgeschlossen. Insbesondere aufgrund der Anreize zur Fehllenkung von öffentlichen Ressourcen wird empfohlen, künftige Förderprogramme eher als zweckungebundene Transferleistungen auszugestalten, die die Kommunen dann nach eigenem Ermessen für „Investitionen“ in Humankapital (Personaleinstellungen oder Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen) oder in Realkapital verwenden können.
Read article

How an IPO Helps in M&A

Ugur Celikyurt, Merih Sevilir, Anil Shivdasani
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, No. 2, 2010
Abstract
An initial public offering (IPO) can often provide a powerful stimulus to private companies seeking to pursue an acquisition-driven growth strategy. Based on a comprehensive analysis of U.S. IPOs, the authors show that newly public companies are prolific acquirers. Over 30% of companies conducting an IPO make at least one acquisition in their IPO year, and the typical IPO firm makes about four acquisitions during its first five years as a public company. IPOs facilitate M&A not only by providing infusions of capital but also by creating ongoing access to equity and debt markets for cash-financed deals. In addition, IPOs create an acquisition currency that can prove valuable in stock-financed deals when the shares are attractively priced. The authors also argue that IPOs improve the ability of companies to conduct M&A by resolving some of the valuation uncertainty facing privately held companies.
Read article

Economic Stimulus Packages and their Effects – A Simulation with the IWH Macroeconometric Model

Rolf Scheufele
Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 1, 2009
Abstract
Im Zuge des starken Konjunktureinbruchs in den großen Industrieländern im Jahr 2008 gewinnt die Diskussion über Konjunkturprogramme immer mehr an Bedeutung. Viele Länder – vor allem die USA – haben in diesem Abschwung bereits entsprechende Programme aufgelegt. Jüngst wurde in Deutschland ein zweites Maßnahmenpaket zur Stützung der Konjunktur verabschiedet, das möglichst rasch umgesetzt werden soll. Inwieweit Konjunkturprogramme tatsächlich in der Lage sind, den derzeitigen Abschwung aufzuhalten oder abzufedern, soll im Folgenden untersucht werden.
Read article

Germany 2004: Only a transitory economic stimulus from moving tax cuts forward

Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 9, 2003
Abstract
Auch im Sommer 2003 hat die deutsche Wirtschaft die seit drei Jahren anhaltende Stagnation nicht überwunden. Im vergangenen Winterhalbjahr haben erneut rezessive Tendenzen die Oberhand gewonnen. Die Inlandsnachfrage nach Konsum- und Investitionsgütern hat sich zwar seit Jahresbeginn etwas gefestigt, sie expandierte jedoch nach wie vor schwach – vor allem wegen der weiterhin rückläufigen Bauinvestitionen. Impulse von der Belebung der Weltkonjunktur fehlen noch ganz. Zudem belastet der gegenüber dem Vorjahr höhere Außenwert des Euro Exporte aus Deutschland und regt Importe an. Die an sich nur verhaltenen konjunkturellen Impulse vom Inland fließen stärker als zuvor in die Nachfrage nach Importgütern ab, und die Außenwirtschaft trägt nicht – wie sonst üblich – zum Anstieg der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Produktion bei, sondern entzieht ihr sogar Kaufkraft.
Read article
Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft LogoTotal-Equality-LogoSupported by the BMWK