Arbeitnehmermitbestimmung und Tarifverträge im Fokus –
14. IWH/IAB-Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik
Eva Hank, Georg Neuschäffer
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2017
Abstract
Bereits zum 14. Mal fand am 18. und 19. September der diesjährige Workshop zur Arbeitsmarktpolitik am IWH in Halle (Saale) statt, der traditionell gemeinsam mit dem Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) organisiert wird. Mit dem Schwerpunkt „Industrielle Beziehungen: Arbeitnehmermitbestimmung und Tarifverträge im Fokus“ widmete sich der Workshop einem wirtschaftspolitisch aktuellen Thema.
Read article
The Dynamic Effects of Works Councils on Plant Productivity: First Evidence from Panel Data
Steffen Müller, Jens Stegmaier
British Journal of Industrial Relations,
No. 2,
2017
Abstract
We estimate dynamic effects of works councils on labour productivity using newly available information from West German establishment panel data. Conditioning on plant fixed effects and control variables, we find negative productivity effects during the first five years after council introduction but a steady and substantial increase in the councils’ productivity effect thereafter. Our findings support a causal interpretation for the positive correlation between council existence and plant productivity that has been frequently reported in previous studies.
Read article
The Behavioral Impact of Non-Monetary Workplace Characteristics
Sabrina Jeworrek
Schriftenreihe innovative betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis,
No. 465,
2016
Abstract
This book investigates the impact of non-monetary workplace characteristics ― i.e. employee voice, task characteristics, and the provision of information ― on workers’ individual decision making and workplace performance. Given the neoclassical assumption of purely self-interested and completely rational utility maximizing individuals, workplace characteristics should be of little interest as long as they are not directly related to payment issues, so that a worker’s utility maximizing effort choice given a fixed wage level remains unaffected. Recent empirical findings, however, suggest that the use of non-monetary incentives might even be the better option to increase work performance. Three out of the four experimental studies covered by this book extend the previous research by providing more reliable insights into field behavior than conventional laboratory experiments. Given e.g. the right to self-determine one’s wage, almost all participants in the laboratory opt for the highest possible wage. Within the context of an inventory taking with 140 assistants, we conducted a natural field experiment and show that most workers ask for rather moderate wages with women being particularly conservative in their demands. Notwithstanding, wage delegation causes workers’ performance to rise and, hence, stresses the relevance of voice at the workplace. Furthermore, we provide evidence that workers also care for the content and the meaningfulness of their tasks. Uselessly exerted effort, for instance, reduces work performance as regards a completely unrelated task in the future. Taken together, the field experimental evidence presented in this book indicates that if employees find a workplace which matches their preferences, it is quite likely to be a beneficial situation not only for the employee but also for the employer. Overall good working conditions can even help workers overlook unequal treatments within the workforce, at least in the short-run and as long as there is a plausible reason for it. An additional laboratory experiment, however, suggests that additional information, e.g. about potential coworkers, might be necessary to make reasonable decisions in accordance with individual preferences.
Read article
Options and Limits of the Matching Approach – An Application to Workers Participation
Birgit Schultz
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 15,
2006
Abstract
Die Evaluation der ökonomischen Wirkungen von betrieblicher Mitbestimmung ist aufgrund von spezifischen Merkmalen bei Betrieben mit Betriebsräten aus methodischer Sicht nicht unproblematisch. So führen bisherige Studien zu teilweise konträren Ergebnissen. In der hier vorliegenden Studie sollen daher die Probleme aufgezeigt, näher diskutiert und Lösungsmöglichkeiten an dem Beispiel der betrieblichen Mitbestimmung in ostdeutschen Betrieben des produzierenden Gewerbes und des Baus dargestellt werden. Es wird ein optimaler Matching-Algorithmus zur Zuordnung von „statistischen Zwillingsbetrieben“ genutzt, der insbesondere gute Matchingergebnisse bei geringen Fallzahlen liefert. Da mit der ursprünglichen Teilnehmergruppe aufgrund kurzer Beobachtungsperioden nur kurzfristige Effekte ermittelt werden können, wird das Matchingverfahren zusätzlich zur Konstruktion verlängerter Beobachtungsperioden genutzt. Bei diesem neuen Anwendungsfall werden Betriebe, die einen Betriebsrat gegründet haben mit sogenannten Stellvertreter-Betrieben, die bereits einen Betriebsrat besitzen, verknüpft. Dadurch werden die kurzen Beobachtungsdauern verlängert, und es können auch Aussagen über die längerfristige Wirkung der betrieblichen Mitbestimmung getroffen werden. Die ermittelten Effekte auf die Produktivität, die Ertragslage und das Qualifikationsniveau der Beschäftigten deuten weder kurz- noch langfristig auf eine signifikante Wirkung der betrieblichen Mitbestimmung hin.
Read article
Who Invests in Training if Contracts are Temporary? - Empirical Evidence for Germany Using Selection Correction
Jan Sauermann
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 14,
2006
Abstract
This study deals with the effect of fixed-term contracts on work-related training. Though previous studies found a negative effect of fixed-term contracts on the participation in training, from the theoretical point of view it is not clear whether workers with fixed-term contracts receive less or more training, compared to workers with permanent contracts. In addition to the existing strand of literature, we especially distinguish between employer- and employee-financed training in order to allow for diverging investment patterns of worker and firm. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we estimate a bivariate probit model to control for selection effects that may arise from unobservable factors, affecting both participation in training and holding fixed-term contracts. Finding negative effects for employer-sponsored, as well as for employee-sponsored training, leads us to conclude that workers with fixed-term contracts do not compensate for lower firm investments.
Read article
