The Impact of Technology and Regulation on the Geographical Scope of Banking
Hans Degryse, Steven Ongena
Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
No. 4,
2004
Abstract
We review how technological advances and changes in regulation may shape the (future) geographical scope of banking. We first review how both physical distance and the presence of borders currently affect bank lending conditions (loan pricing and credit availability) and market presence (branching and servicing). Next we discuss how technology and regulation have altered this impact and analyse the current state of the European banking sector. We discuss both theoretical contributions and empirical work and highlight open questions along the way. We draw three main lessons from the current theoretical and empirical literature: (i) bank lending to small businesses in Europe may be characterized both by (local) spatial pricing and resilient (regional and/or national) market segmentation; (ii) because of informational asymmetries in the retail market, bank mergers and acquisitions seem the optimal route of entering another market, long before cross-border servicing or direct entry are economically feasible; and (iii) current technological and regulatory developments may, to a large extent, remain impotent in further dismantling the various residual but mutually reinforcing frictions in the retail banking markets in Europe. We conclude the paper by offering pertinent policy recommendations based on these three lessons.
Read article
Are European Equity Style Indexes Mean Reverting? Testing the Validity of the Efficient Market Hypothesis
Marian Berneburg
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 193,
2004
Abstract
The article tests for a random walk in European equity style indexes. After briefly
introducing the efficient market hypothesis, equity styles in general and the used
statistical techniques (Variance Ratio Test and modified Rescaled Range Test) it is
shown that a random walk in European equity style indexes cannot be rejected. At least in the period since the mid 70s, for which this research has been conducted, the weak form efficient market hypothesis seems to hold.
Read article
Bank Market Discipline and Indicators of Banking System Risk: The European Evidence
Reint E. Gropp
Market Discipline Across Countries and Industries,
2004
Abstract
Read article
The Contestable Markets Theory - Efficient Advice for Economic Policy
Christian Growitsch, Thomas Wein
Externe Publikationen,
2004
Abstract
During the nineties of the last century several formerly monopolistic markets (telecommunication, electricity, gas, and railway) have been deregulated in Germany based on European directives and theoretically inspired by the theory of contestable markets. The original contestable market theory implied three assumptions necessary to be satisfied to establish potential competition: Free market entry, market exit possible without any costs, and the price adjustment lag exceeding the entry lag. Our analysis shows that if the incumbent reduces its prices slowly (high adjustment lag) and the market entry can be performed quickly (low entry lag), a new competitor will be able to earn back sunk costs. Therefore it is not necessary that all three conditions be complied with for potential competition to exist. Applying this „revised“ contestable market theory to the deregulated sectors in Germany, natural monopolies can be identified in telecommunication sections local loops and local/regional connection networks, in the national electricity grid and the regional/local electricity distribution networks, in the national and regional/local gas transmission/distribution sections, and in the railroad network. These sections are not contestable due to sunk costs, expected high entry lags and a probably short price adjustment lag. They are identified as bottlenecks, which should be regulated. The function of system operators in energy and railroad are closely related to the non-contestable monopolistic networks.
Read article
The influence of Vertical Integration and Property Rights on Network Access Charges in the German Electricity Markets
Christian Growitsch, Thomas Wein
Externe Publikationen,
No. 6,
2004
Abstract
German Electricity markets were deregulated in the late nineties of the last century. In contrast to other European countries, the German government enacted negotiated third party access instead of installing a regulation authority. Network access charges for new competitors are based on contractual arrangements between energy producers and industrial consumers, which specify the calculation schemes for access charges. Local and regional suppliers are nevertheless able to set (monopolistic) charges at their own discretion, restricted only by the possibility of interference competition authorities. While some of those suppliers have been acquired by one of the four Transmission System Operators and become vertically integrated, the majority is still independent public utility companies. In this paper we analyse if there is evidence for different charging behaviour depending on the supplier’s economic independence or its level of vertical integration. Controlling for other coefficients as the so called structural features and related cost differences as well as the influence of competition law suits, multivariate estimations show significantly lower access charges than vertically separated suppliers, whereas incorporated network operators charge significantly higher charges compared to independent suppliers for at least one typical case.
Read article
Liberalization of Electricity Markets in Selected European Countries
Albrecht Kauffmann, M. Keim, P. J. J. Welfens
Diskussionsbeiträge des Europäischen Instituts für Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen (EIIW), Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Nr. 124,
No. 124,
2004
Abstract
Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Liberalisierung der Elektrizitätsmärkte in der EU. Man kann feststellen, dass die Gemeinschaftsdirektive 96/92/EC die Wechselbeziehungen der Elektrizitätsmärkte nicht ausreichend behandelt. Außerdem wird vor allem in Deutschland der Zugang für Dritte nicht effektiv gefördert, wobei der Zusammenschluss eines großen Elektrizitätsunternehmens und einem dominanten Gasunternehmen neue spezielle Fragen aufgeworfen hat. Hingegen verläuft der Liberalisierungsprozess in Skandinavien konsequenter. Osteuropäische EU-Beitrittsländer sind langfristig potenzielle Elektrizitätsexporteure sobald Modernisierungen zu niedrigeren Energie- und Elektrizitätsverbrauch führen. Russland sollte rasch WTO-Mitglied werden, um Zugang zu den westeuropäischen Elektrizitätsmärkten zu bekommen, wobei Russland in den gesamten Liberalisierungsdiskussionen noch keine Rolle gespielt hat. Mittelfristig können Überschusskapazitäten in einer EU-27 erwartet werden. Zweifelhaft jedoch ist, ob Politiker, die ansonsten so ehrgeizige Ambitionen in der Umweltpolitik zeigen, einer gesamteuropäischen Liberalisierung der Elektrizitätsmärkte zustimmen werden. Außerdem werden regulierungspolitische Aspekte behandelt.
Read article
Deregulation and liberalization in European electricity industry
Constanze Kreis
Schriften des IWH,
No. 17,
2004
Abstract
Seit Ende der 80er Jahre ist weltweit eine zunehmende Liberalisierung und Deregulierung von Wirtschaftsbereichen zu verzeichnen, in denen der Ausschluss von Wettbewerb durch das Vorherrschen von Monopolstrukturen und deren Regulierung kennzeichnend war. Im Zuge dieser Entwicklung wurde mit der Verabschiedung der EU-Richtlinie zur Schaffung eines Binnenmarktes für Elektrizität im Jahre 1996 auch in Europa ein neuer energiepolitischer Ordnungsrahmen geschaffen, nachdem hier zunächst kontroverse Debatten für eine zögerliche Herangehensweise an Strukturreformen auf diesem Gebiet geführt haben. Die Umsetzung der Richtlinie hat seither, wenn auch in unterschiedlichem Maße, in den nationalen Strommärkten zu tiefgreifenden strukturellen Umbrüchen geführt. Die Reorganisation dieses Wirtschaftszweigs ist aber im europäischen Maßstab bisher keineswegs abgeschlossen und der transnationale Handel mit Strom noch eingeschränkt. Die vorliegende Arbeit wendet sich angesichts der dynamischen Situation auf diesem noch jungen Wettbewerbsmarkt einer Reihe interessanter wissenschaftlicher Fragestellungen zu, die sich aus dem Prozess der Deregulierung und Liberalisierung der Stromwirtschaft ergeben. Wegen der Besonderheiten des Gutes „Elektrizität“ sind die Erkenntnisse, die über Marktvorgänge in anderen Wirtschaftsbereichen gewonnen wurden, nicht uneingeschränkt auf die Elektrizitätswirtschaft zu übertragen. Die Thematik weist damit eine große Heterogenität und Komplexität auf. Die Autorin trägt diesem Umstand Rechnung, indem sie mehrere Kapitel aus jeweils unterschiedlicher Perspektive mit verschiedenen Methoden den Deregulierungsprozess analysiert. Im Ergebnis lässt sich festhalten, dass der Bereich der Elektrizitätswirtschaft ein Sektor bleiben wird, der nicht nur während seiner Umbruchphase, sondern grundsätzlich auch weiterhin besonderer wettbewerbspolitischer Aufmerksamkeit bedarf, da trotz bereits zu verzeichnender Effizienzgewinne nicht davon ausgegangen werden kann, dass im Zuge der Deregulierung und Liberalisierung eine erhöhte Effizienz allein durch Regulierungsabbau erzielt wird.
Read article
Employment effects of development of renewable energies
Steffen Hentrich, Jürgen Wiemers, Joachim Ragnitz
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 1,
2004
Abstract
Die Bundesregierung strebt bis zum Jahr 2010 eine Verdopplung des Anteils erneuerbarer Energien am Primärenergie- sowie am Bruttostromverbrauch an. Das vorrangige Ziel der damit verbundenen Umstrukturierung des Energiesektors ist die Verbesserung der Umweltqualität. Es darf jedoch nicht außer Acht gelassen werden, dass die Förderung erneuerbarer Energien zwangsläufig auch gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen hat. Angesichts der anhaltend angespannten Lage am Arbeitsmarkt stehen dabei insbesondere die Beschäftigungseffekte der Förderung erneuerbarer Energien im Mittelpunkt des öffentlichen und wirtschaftspolitischen Interesses.
Read article
Evolving Structural Patterns in the Enlarging European Division of Labour: Sectoral and Branch Specialisation and the Potentials for Closing the Productivity Gap
Johannes Stephan
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 5,
2003
Abstract
This report summarises the results generated in empirical analysis within a larger EU 5th FP RTD-project on the determinants of productivity gaps between the current EU-15 and accession states in Central East Europe. The focus of research in this part of the project is on sectoral specialisation patterns emerging as a result of intensifying integration between the current EU and a selection of six newly acceding economies, namely Estonia, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary and Slovenia. The research-leading question is concerned with the role played by the respective specialisation patterns for (i) the explanation of observed productivity gaps and for (ii) the projection of future potentials of productivity growth in Central East Europe.
For the aggregated level, analysis determines the share of national productivity gaps accountable to acceding countries’ particular sectoral patterns, and their role for aggregate productivity growth: in Poland, the Slovak Republic and Hungary, sectoral shares of national productivity gaps are considerable and might evolve into a ‘barrier’ to productivity catch-up.Moreover, past productivity growth was dominated by a downward adjustment in employment rather than structural change. With the industrial sector of manufacturing having been identified as the main source of national productivity gaps and growth, the subsequent analysis focuses on the role of industrial specialisation patterns and develops an empirical model to project future productivity growth potentials. Each chapter closes with some policy conclusions.
Read article
Why do we have an interbank money market?
Jürgen Wiemers, Ulrike Neyer
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 182,
2003
Abstract
The interbank money market plays a key role in the execution of monetary policy. Hence, it is important to know the functioning of this market and the determinants of the interbank money market rate. In this paper, we develop an interbank money market model with a heterogeneous banking sector. We show that besides for balancing daily liquidity fluctuations banks participate in the interbank market because they have different marginal costs of obtaining funds from the central bank. In the euro area, which we refer to, these cost differences occur because banks have different marginal cost of collateral which they need to hold to obtain funds from the central bank. Banks with relatively low marginal costs act as intermediaries between the central bank and banks with relatively high marginal costs. The necessary positive spread between the interbank market rate and the central bank rate is determined by transaction costs and credit risk in the interbank market, total liquidity needs of the banking sector, costs of obtaining funds from the central bank, and the distribution of the latter across banks.
Read article