Vertical and horizontal patterns of intra-industry trade between EU and candidate countries
Hubert Gabrisch
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 2,
2003
Abstract
Trade between the European Union (EU) and the Transition Economies (TE) is increasingly characterised by intra-industry trade. The decomposition of intra-industry trade into horizontal and vertical shares reveals predominantly vertical structures with decisively more quality advantages for the EU and less quality advantages for TE countries whenever trade has been liberalised. Empirical research on factors determining this structure in a EU-TE framework lags behind theoretical and empirical research on horizontal and vertical trade in other regions of the world. The main objective of this paper is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate on EU-TE trade structures by offering an explanation of vertical trade. We utilise a cross-country approach in which relative wage differences, country size and income distribution play a leading role. We find first that relative differences in wages (per capita income) and country size explain intraindustry trade when trade is vertical and completely liberalised, and second that crosscountry differences in income distribution play no explanatory role. We conclude that EU firms have been able to increase their product quality and to shift low-quality segments to TE countries. This may suggest a product-quality cycle prevalent in EU-TE trade.
Read article
Innovation co-operations in East and West Germany: Surprising differences
Jutta Günther
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 4,
2003
Abstract
Der Beitrag untersucht das Kooperationsverhalten ostdeutscher Unternehmen auf dem Gebiet der Innovation und geht dabei der Frage nach, ob und inwieweit sich kooperierende Unternehmen im Vergleich zu nicht-kooperierenden Unternehmen durch eine stärkere Innovationsaktivität und höhere Produktivität auszeichnen. Die auf der Basis einer Auswertung des Mannheimer Innovationspanels gewonnenen Ergebnisse zeigen, dass - entgegen einem verbreiteten Vorurteil - ostdeutsche Unternehmen im Vergleich zu westdeutschen Unternehmen häufiger kooperieren, und dass die Unterschiede bezüglich der Wahl der Kooperationspartner primär die unterschiedlichen strukturellen Gegebenheiten Ost- und Westdeutschlands widerspiegeln. Kooperierende Unternehmen sind in Ost- und Westdeutschland deutlich innovativer als nicht-kooperierende Unternehmen. Ein Produktivitätsvorsprung kooperierender Unternehmen gegenüber nicht-kooperierenden Unternehmen zeigt sich jedoch nur in Westdeutschland. Ostdeutsche kooperierende Unternehmen verzeichnen sogar eine leicht niedrigere Produktivität als ostdeutsche nicht-kooperierende Unternehmen.
Read article
Innovation cooperation in East Germany - only a half-way success?
Jutta Günther
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 170,
2003
Abstract
The paper focuses on the question whether enterprises that engage in innovation cooperation with external partners are more innovative and thus more productive than non-cooperating firms. A comparison between East and West Germany is being made. It shows that cooperating enterprises in East and West Germany are indeed more innovative than non-cooperating firms, but there remains a clear productivity gap between East and West German cooperating firms. Furthermore, in East Germany - different from West Germany - non-cooperating firms are even more productive than cooperating firms.
Read article
Subjective assessments of life situation in East and West Germany still differ
Cornelia Lang
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 11,
2002
Abstract
Die rasche Angleichung der ostdeutschen Lebensverhältnisse an das hohe westdeutsche Niveau war eine der wesentlichen Erwartungen an den Prozess der deutschen Wiedervereinigung. Inzwischen ist Ernüchterung eingetreten und es hat sich die Erkenntnis verbreitet, dass das Zusammenwachsen der ost- und westdeutschen Bundesländer ein längerfristiger Prozess ist. Gegenwärtig bestehen noch deutliche Unterschiede in der Einschätzung der persönlichen und allgemeinen wirtschaftlichen Lage durch Ostdeutsche und Westdeutsche, wie Umfrageergebnisse zeigen. Die Differenzen in den Wahrnehmungen manifestieren sich aber nicht in einer Ablehnung der Bundesrepublik und ihrer Institutionen durch die ostdeutsche Bevölkerung.
Read article
Current Trends - Differences in real savings despite almost equal savings ratio in East and West Germany
Ruth Grunert
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 3,
2002
Abstract
Read article
Intra-industry trade between European Union and Transition Economies. Does income distribution matter?
Hubert Gabrisch, Maria Luigia Segnana
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 155,
2002
Abstract
EU-TE trade is increasingly characterised by intra-industry trade. For some countries (Czech Republic), the share of intra-industry trade in total trade with the EU approaches 60 percent. The decomposition of intra-industry trade into horizontal and vertical shares reveals overwhelming vertical structures with strong quality advantages for the EU and shrinking quality advantages for TE countries wherever trade has been liberalised. Empirical research on factors determining this structure in an EU-TE framework has lagged theoretical and empirical research on horizontal trade and vertical trade in other regions of the world. The main objective of this paper is, therefore, to contribute to the ongoing debate over EU-TE trade structures, by offering an explanation of intra-industry trade. We utilize a cross-country approach in which relative wage differences and country size play a leading role. In addition, as implied by a model of the productquality
cycle, we examine income distribution factors as determinates of the emerging
EU-TE structure of trade flows. Using OLS regressions, we find first, that relative
differences in wages (per capita income) and country size explain intra-industry trade, when trade is vertical and completely liberalized and second, that cross country differences in income distribution play no explanatory role. We conclude that if increasing wage differences resulted from an increasing productivity gap between highquality and low-quality industries, then vertical structures will, over the long-term create significant barriers for the increase in TE incomes and lowering EU-TE income differentials.
Read article
Local Taxes and Capital Structure Choice
Reint E. Gropp
International Tax and Public Finance,
No. 1,
2002
Abstract
This paper investigates the question of taxation and capital structure choice in Germany. Germany represents an excellent case study for investigating the question of whether and to what extent taxes influence the debt-equity decision of firms, because the relative tax burdens on debt and equity vary greatly across communities. German communities levy local taxes on profits and long-term debt payments in addition to personal and corporate taxes on the federal level. A stylized model is presented incorporating these taxes. The model shows that local taxes create substantial incentives for firms to use debt financing. Furthermore, the paper empirically investigates the effect of local business taxes on the share of debt used to finance incremental investments by German firms. I find that local taxes significantly influence the capital structure choice of firms, controlling for a large number of other factors. In an extensive sensitivity analysis the tax effect are found to be robust across several different specifications.
Read article
Korean unification and banking system - An analysis in view of German experiences and Korean differences
Ralf Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 139,
2001
Abstract
One of the reforms that have to be launched in a future unification process in Korea, which seems possible after the political negotiations last year, is the transformation of the North Korean banking system. The question arises whether Korea could profit from the German experience where banking transformation was one of the rather few success stories in unification. In 1990 the East German banking transformation was achieved relatively fast and uncomplicated due to considerable direct investments of the West German banks compounded with state guarantees for bad loans resulting from the credit business with existing GDR-corporations. Unfortunately, South Korea currently lacks some major prerequesites that contributed to the German banking unification, among them – and probably the most important one – is the lack of a sound and efficient banking
system that could become active in the North. Consequently, depending on the circumstances of a future Korean unification either a more gradual process is recommended or, if inner-Korean migration requires a more dynamic transition, considerable investment by foreign banks and assistance from international organisations is recommended.
Read article
A glimpse on sectoral convergence of productivity levels
Gerald Müller
IWH Discussion Papers,
No. 133,
2001
Abstract
This paper examines the presence of sectoral convergence of labor productivity between 14 OECD countries. Using the OECD International Sectoral Data Base (ISDB), the paper looks at the developments within 12 distinct sectors during the period 1970-1995. The change of the coefficients of variance suggests that there is strong sectoral convergence within most service sectors while the evidence of convergence for Manufacturing as well as for Communication is rather weak. These findings are in line with most studies undertaken on this subject so far. It is concluded that economic theories at hand to explain growth and convergence (or divergence respectively) are of different importance for the sectors concerned. While models of the New Growth Theory seemed to be useful to explain growth mechanisms within Manufacturing and Communication, traditional models seemed to apply to most other sectors.
Read article
Differences in productivity and convergence of economic regions – The example of the New Länder -
Gerald Müller, Joachim Ragnitz, Anita Wölfl
IWH-Sonderhefte,
No. 3,
2001
Abstract
Auch im Jahre 2000 liegt das Produktivitätsniveau, das im Durchschnitt der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft erreicht wird, bei nur etwa zwei Dritteln des westdeutschen Wertes. Zwar gibt es eine erhebliche Differenzierung nach Unternehmen, nach Branchen und nach Regionen. Im Ganzen stellen die neuen Länder aber noch immer eine strukturschwache Region dar, und es ist offenkundig, dass das Ziel einer Angleichung der Pro-Kopf-Einkommen an das Westniveau kurzfristig nicht erreicht werden kann.
Die Frage, weshalb das Produktivitätsniveau in der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft weiterhin deutlich niedriger liegt als in Westdeutschland, ist auch 10 Jahre nach der deutschen Vereinigung noch nicht abschließend geklärt. In der Literatur gibt es zwar inzwischen eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlich gut begründeter Hypothesen, mit denen der Produktivitätsrückstand auf verschiedene betriebsinterne und -externe Faktoren zurückgeführt werden soll. Eine umfassende Gesamtdarstellung fehlt aber bislang noch. Auch die Frage, welche Schlussfolgerungen angesichts des anhaltend niedrigen Produktivitätsniveaus für den weiteren Konvergenzprozess zu ziehen sind, ist noch nicht überzeugend beantwortet.
Angesichts dieser Forschungsdefizite hat das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie mit Schreiben vom 29. April 1998 das Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle beauftragt, im Rahmen der sektoralen Strukturberichterstattung das Thema „Produktivitätsunterschiede und Konvergenz von Wirtschaftsräumen – Das Beispiel der neuen Länder“ zu bearbeiten. Das IWH legt hiermit den Abschlussbericht zu diesem Projekt vor.
Read article
