We document and dissect a new stylized fact about firm growth: the shift from labor to intermediate inputs. This shift occurs in input quantities, cost and output shares, and output elasticities. We establish this fact using German firm-level data and replicate it in administrative firm data from 11 additional countries. We also document these patterns in micro-aggregated industry data for 20 European countries (and, with respect to industry cost shares, for the US). We rationalize this novel regularity within a parsimonious model featuring (i) an elasticity of substitution between intermediates and labor that exceeds unity, and (ii) an increasing shadow price of labor relative to intermediates, due to monopsony power over labor or labor adjustment costs. The shift from labor to intermediates accounts for one half to one third of the decline in the labor share in growing firms (the remainder is due to wage markdowns and markups) and rationalizes most of the labor share decline in growing industries.

This paper analyzes the distribution and composition of pre-tax national income in Germany since 1992, combining personal income tax returns, household survey data, and national accounts. Inequality rose from the 1990s to the late 2000s due to falling labor incomes among the bottom 50% and rising incomes in the top 10%. This trend reversed after 2007 as labor incomes across the bottom 90% increased. The top 1% income share, dominated by business income, remained relatively stable between 1992 and 2019. A large share of Germany’s top 1% earners are non-corporate business owners in labor-intensive professions. At least half of the business owners in P99-99.9 and a quarter in the top 0.1% operate firms in professional services – a pattern mirroring the United States. From 1992 to 2019, Germany’s top 0.1% income concentration exceeded France’s and matched U.S. levels until the late 2000s.

Der deutsche Konjunkturmotor stottert weiter vor sich hin. Obwohl das Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) im dritten Quartal 2024 um 0,2% zunahm, liegt es immer noch unter dem Niveau vom ersten Quartal 2024, da das zweite Quartal nach neuesten Zahlen weitaus schwächer ausgefallen ist als zuvor gemeldet (vgl. Abbildung 1). Der leichte Zuwachs im dritten Quartal dürfte dabei vor allem auf gestiegene staatliche und private Konsumausgaben zurückzuführen sein. In den Unternehmen ist die Stimmung weiterhin trüb und die wirtschaftspolitische Unsicherheit dürfte weiterhin hoch bleiben. Zudem belasten nach wie vor gestiegene Energie- und Lohnkosten die Investitionsbereitschaft der Unternehmen. Alles in allem dürfte das Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) laut IWH-Flash-Indikator im vierten Quartal 2024 stagnieren. Für den Jahresbeginn 2025 deuten allerdings die Frühindikatoren auf eine Belebung der wirtschaftlichen Aktivitäten und einen Anstieg des BIP um 0,4% hin. Diese reflektieren jedoch noch nicht die jüngsten politischen Ereignisse in den USA und in Deutschland.

We use granular project-level information for the largest regional economic development program in German history to study whether government subsidies to firms affect the quantity and quality of bank lending. We combine the universe of recipient firms under the Improvement of Regional Economic Structures program (GRW) with their local banks during 1998-2019. The modalities of GRW subsidies to firms are determined at the EU level. Therefore, we use it to identify bank outcomes. Banks with relationships to more subsidized firms exhibit higher lending volumes without any significant differences in bank stability. Subsidized firms, in turn, borrow more indicating that banks facilitate regional economic development policies.

Based on the sufficient statistics approach developed by Huang and Ottaviano (2024), we show how the state of technology of European industries relative to the rest of the world can be empirically assessed in a way that is simple in terms of computation, parsimonious in terms of data requirements, but still comprehensive in terms of information. The lack of systematic cross-industry correlation between export specialization and technological advantage suggests that standard measures of revealed comparative advantage only imperfectly capture a country’s technological prowess due to the concurrent influences of factor prices, market size, markups, firm selection and market share reallocation.