Search Results

All

Data Type

Page (7)

Publication (7)

Press release (3)

Topic

Economic Outlook (3)

Forecasts (3)

Labour Market (2)

Brexit (1)

Coal Phase-out (1)

Year

Refresh

International Trade Barriers and Regional Employment: The Case of a No-Deal Brexit

Hans-Ulrich Brautzsch, Oliver Holtemöller

Journal of Economic Structures, No. 11, 2021

Abstract

We use the World Input–Output Database (WIOD) combined with regional sectoral employment data to estimate the potential regional employment effects of international trade barriers. We study the case of a no-deal Brexit in which imports to the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU) would be subject to tariffs and non-tariff trade costs. First, we derive the decline in UK final goods imports from the EU from industry-specific international trade elasticities, tariffs and non-tariff trade costs. Using input–output analysis, we estimate the potential output and employment effects for 56 industries and 43 countries on the national level. The absolute effects would be largest in big EU countries which have close trade relationships with the UK, such as Germany and France. However, there would also be large countries outside the EU which would be heavily affected via global value chains, such as China, for example. The relative effects (in percent of total employment) would be largest in Ireland followed by Belgium. In a second step, we split up the national effects on the NUTS-2 level for EU member states and additionally on the county (NUTS-3) level for Germany. The share of affected workers varies between 0.03% and 3.4% among European NUTS-2 regions and between 0.15% and 0.4% among German counties. A general result is that indirect effects via global value chains, i.e., trade in intermediate inputs, are more important than direct effects via final demand.

Read article

Wages and the Value of Nonemployment

Simon Jäger, Benjamin Schoefer, Samuel Young, Josef Zweimüller

Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 4, 2020

Abstract

Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage-setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers hired out of unemployment. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment.

Read article

01.07.2020 • 11/2020

New Horizon 2020 project: The Challenge of the Social Impact of Energy Transitions

Funded by the European Commission’s Framework Programme Horizon 2020, the ENTRANCES project recently closed its kick-off meeting with a high scientific and institutional participation, and taking on the challenge of modeling the social impact of the energy transition.

Oliver Holtemöller

Read

EFN Report Winter 2014/15: Economic Outlook for the Euro Area in 2015 and 2016

EFN Reports, No. 1, 2015

Abstract

At the beginning of the year 2015 crude oil is, with little more than 50 dollars per barrel (Brent), about 50% cheaper than in the summer 2014. The oil price hike is a stimulus for the whole world economy, even though the gains of energy users are matched by losses of the suppliers: oil producing countries frequently run high current account surpluses vis-à-vis the rest of the world. It is therefore plausible to assume that, reacting to the redistribution of incomes, the oil user countries will increase their spending by more than what will be lost in spending by producers. Investment activity in the euro area has recently been particularly weak. Remarkably, investment in Greece, Portugal, and Spain, i.e. in countries that had to accept international support during the euro crisis, has strengthened. The setback took place in the so-called core countries, including Germany. Consumption growth was also subdued. Lower oil prices, by increasing real incomes of consumers and lowering production costs for firms, should increase private consumption and, in particular, investment. Moreover, the depreciation of the euro will favour exports. Overall, according to our forecasts, the euro area GDP will grow by 1.3% in 2015 and by 1.6% in 2016. GDP growth is about 0.3 percentage points higher due to the impact of lower oil prices in 2015. However, these forecasts are subject to substantial uncertainty, and we do not see any significant reduction of the unemployment rate during the forecasting horizon. Our inflation forecast for 2015 is 0.3%, with the possibility of a mild deflation not excluded. In 2016 inflation will increase up to 1.1%, still clearly below the 2% ECB’s target. This calls for further monetary expansion, though its effects could be limited in the absence of a complementary fiscal stimulus. The expansionary cyclical policies should be combined with more structural reforms to enhance the competitiveness of the euro area and its growth potential, which in our forecasts remains quite limited. In fact, we expect potential output to grow by only 0.4% both in 2015 and 2016.

Read article

Binnenwirtschaft trägt Konjunktur in Deutschland

Wirtschaft im Wandel, No. 1, 2014

Abstract

In diesem Artikel wird die Konjunkturprognose des IWH vom 12. Dezember 2013 zusammenfassend dargestellt. Die Weltwirtschaft dürfte im Jahr 2014 in moderatem Tempo expandieren. Die wirtschaftliche Erholung im Euroraum bleibt schleppend. In Deutschland setzt sich dagegen der im Frühjahr 2013 begonnene Aufschwung fort. Er wird von der binnenwirtschaftlichen Nachfrage getragen. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt dürfte im Jahr 2014 um 1,8% (66%-Prognoseintervall: 1,0% bis 2,7%) zulegen, nach 0,4% im Jahr 2013. Die Arbeitslosenquote sinkt leicht auf 6,5%, die Verbraucherpreise steigen wie schon 2013 um 1,5%. Der Finanzierungssaldo des Staates nimmt konjunkturbedingt noch etwas zu, auf 0,3% im Jahr 2014.

Read article

Konjunktur aktuell: Binnenwirtschaft trägt Konjunktur in Deutschland

Konjunktur aktuell, No. 1, 2014

Abstract

Zum Ende des Jahres 2013 expandiert die Weltproduktion in einem Tempo, das in etwa dem Durchschnitt der vergangenen Jahrzehnte entspricht. Im Jahr 2014 dürfte die gegenwärtige konjunkturelle Dynamik in etwa gehalten werden. In den USA wird die Konjunktur voraussichtlich deutlich anziehen. Die Wirtschaft des Euroraums dürfte sich weiter langsam erholen, denn die Dämpfung von Seiten der Finanzpolitik lässt deutlich nach, und die Schrumpfungsprozesse laufen langsam aus. In Deutschland setzt sich der im Frühjahr begonnene binnenwirtschaftliche Aufschwung fort. Das Bruttoinlandsprodukt dürfte im Jahr 2013 zwar nur um 0,4% zunehmen (66%-Prognoseintervall: 0,3 bis 0,5%). Insgesamt weist die deutsche Wirtschaft aber eine gute Konstitution auf. Die Erwerbstätigkeit ist auch wegen arbeitsmarktbedingter Zuwanderung aus Europa auf einem historischen Hoch und die realen verfügbaren Einkommen steigen beschleunigt. Die binnenwirtschaftlichen Expansionskräfte dürften deshalb nach dem mäßigen Winterbeginn wieder stärker an Boden gewinnen. Dieses Gesamtbild bleibt auch für den weiteren Verlauf von 2014 und 2015 bestimmend. Mit der langsamen Erholung in Europa werden die Exporte an Kraft und Dynamik gewinnen. Angesichts der breit angelegten Belebung der Binnennachfrage werden aber auch die Importe im Prognosezeitraum weiter kräftig zulegen, sodass der Außenhandel wohl per saldo einen negativen Beitrag zur gesamtwirtschaftlichen Expansion liefern wird. Alles in allem wird sich die Produktion in Deutschland im Jahr 2014 beschleunigen. Nach einer leichten Unterauslastung der Kapazitäten im Jahr 2013 dürfte die Produktionslücke im Prognosezeitraum positiv ausfallen. Die gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktion steigt im Jahr 2014 wohl um 1,8% (66%-Prognoseintervall: 1,0 bis 2,7%). Die Verbraucherpreisinflation dürfte in den Jahren 2013 und 2014 bei 1,5% liegen. Die öffentlichen Haushalte werden im Jahr 2013 einen etwas höheren Überschuss aufweisen als im Jahr zuvor. Im Jahr 2014 wird sich der Finanzierungssaldo des Staates trotz der Mehrausgaben für sozialpolitische Maßnahmen und staatliche Investitionen aufgrund konjunkturbedingt beschleunigt expandierender Einnahmen weiter verbessern.

Read article

Introducing Financial Frictions and Unemployment into a Small Open Economy Model

Mathias Trabandt, Lawrence J. Christiano, Karl Walentin

Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, No. 12, 2011

Abstract

Which are the main frictions and the driving forces of business cycle dynamics in an open economy? To answer this question we extend the standard new Keynesian model in three dimensions: we incorporate financing frictions for capital, employment frictions for labor and extend the model into a small open economy setting. We estimate the model on Swedish data. Our main results are that (i) a financial shock is pivotal for explaining fluctuations in investment and GDP. (ii) The marginal efficiency of investment shock has negligible importance. (iii) The labor supply shock is unimportant in explaining GDP and no high frequency wage markup shock is needed.

Read article

• previous
• 1
• 2