Globalisation and the Competitiveness of the Euro Area
Filippo di Mauro, Katrin Forster
ECB Occasional Paper Series,
No. 97,
2008
Abstract
Against the background of increasing competition and other significant structural changes implied by globalisation, maintaining and enhancing competitiveness has evolved into one of the prime concerns in most countries. Following up on previous work (see in particular ECB Occasional Papers No. 30 and No. 55), this Occasional Paper examines the latest developments and prospects for the competitiveness and trade performance of the euro area and the euro area countries. Starting from an analysis of most commonly used, traditional competitiveness indicators, the paper largely confirms the findings of previous studies that there have been substantial adjustments in euro area trade. Euro area firms have taken advantage of the new opportunities offered by globalisation, and have at the same time been increasingly challenged by emerging economies. This is primarily reflected in the loss of export market shares which have been recorded over the last decade. While these can partly be related to the losses in the euro area's price competitiveness, further adjustment also seems warranted with regard to the export specialisation. Compared with other advanced competitors, the euro area remains relatively more specialised in labour intensive categories of goods and has shown only a few signs of a stronger specialisation in research-intensive goods. Nevertheless, the paper generally calls for a more cautious approach when assessing the prospects for euro area competitiveness, as globalisation has made it increasingly difficult to define and measure competitiveness. Stressing the need to take a broader view on competitiveness, specifically with a stronger emphasis on productivity performance, the paper also introduces a more elaborate framework that takes into account the interactions between country-specific factors and firm-level productivity. It thus makes it possible to construct more broadly defined competitiveness measures. Pointing to four key factors determining the global competitiveness of euro area countries - market accessibility, market size, technological leadership of firms and institutional set-up - the analysis provides further arguments for continuing efforts to increase market integration and strengthen the competitive environment within Europe as a mean of enhancing resource allocation and coping with the challenges globalisation creates.
Read article
International Financial Integration and Stability: On the Causes of the International Banking Crisis 2007/08 and Some Preliminary Lessons.
Diemo Dietrich, Achim Hauck
Wirtschaft im Wandel,
No. 5,
2008
Abstract
Die gemeinhin als „Subprime-Krise“ bezeichneten Turbulenzen auf den internationalen Finanzmärkten beherrschen, seitdem sich im vergangenen Sommer ihre ersten Symptome aufzeigten, weltweit die wirtschaftspolitische Diskussion. Dabei stand zunächst die Frage im Vordergrund, ob und welche Maßnahmen kurzfristig erforderlich sind, um das internationale Finanzsystem zu stabilisieren und mögliche negative realwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der Krise zu begrenzen. In jüngerer Zeit wird darüber hinausgehend verstärkt diskutiert, welche grundsätzlichen Lehren aus den Ereignissen gezogen werden können und welche Konsequenzen sich für die zukünftige Ausgestaltung nationaler und internationaler Rahmenbedingungen für die internationale Finanzintegration ergeben. In der bisherigen Diskussion wurde eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Einzelfaktoren als ursächlich für die Krise betrachtet und mehr oder weniger isoliert voneinander hinsichtlich ihrer möglichen wirtschaftspolitischen Implikationen untersucht. Die Frage nach der Existenz einer gemeinsamen Quelle für diese vielen mutmaßlichen Gründe ist mithin bislang noch nicht in hinreichendem Maß beantwortet, sodass aus der Krise noch keine über Teilaspekte hinausgehende grundsätzlichen Erkenntnisse für die Wirtschaftspolitik abgeleitet werden konnten.
Der vorliegende Beitrag befasst sich zum einen mit der Frage nach der Hauptursache der Krise. Es wird aufgezeigt, dass sie zu einem bedeutenden Teil auf die Integration vormals peripherer und institutionell schwach entwickelter Volkswirtschaften in die Weltwirtschaft und die damit verbundenen globalen Ungleichgewichte zurückgeführt werden kann. Entsprechend ist die Krise nicht nur in ihrer Wirkung, sondern vor allem in ihrer Ursache ein globales und kein vorrangig US-amerikanisches Phänomen. Auf der Grundlage dieses Befunds werden vorläufige Lehren aus der Subprime-Krise für eine stabilitätsorientierte Wirtschaftspolitik in einer integrierten Weltwirtschaft gezogen.
Read article
Deeper, Wider and More Competitive? Monetary Integration, Eastern Enlargement and Competitiveness in the European Union
Gianmarco Ottaviano, Daria Taglioni, Filippo di Mauro
ECB Working Paper,
No. 847,
2008
Abstract
What determines a country’s ability to compete in international markets? What fosters the global competitiveness of its firms? And in the European context, have key elements of the EU strategy such as EMU and enlargement helped or hindered domestic firms’ competitiveness in local and global markets? We address these questions by calibrating and simulating a conceptual framework that, based on Melitz and Ottaviano (2005), predicts that tougher and more transparent international competition forces less productive firms out the market, thereby increasing average productivity as well as reducing average prices and mark-ups. The model also predicts a parallel reduction of price dispersion within sectors. Our conceptual framework allows us to disentangle the effects of technology and freeness of entry from those of accessibility. On the one hand, by controlling for the impact of trade frictions, we are able to construct an index of ‘revealed competitiveness’, which would drive the relative performance of countries in an ideal world in which all faced the same barriers to international transactions. On the other hand, by focusing on the role of accessibility while keeping ‘revealed competitiveness’ as given, we are able to evaluate the impacts of EMU and enlargement on the competitiveness of European firms. We find that EMU positively affects the competitiveness of firms located in participating economies. Enlargement has, instead, two contrasting effects. It improves the accessibility of EU members but it also increases substantially the relative importance of unproductive competitors from Eastern Europe. JEL Classification: F12, R13.
Read article
Determinants and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from German Firm-Level Data
Claudia M. Buch, J. Kleinert, A. Lipponer
Economic Policy,
No. 41,
2005
Abstract
Foreign direct investment is an essential aspect of ‘globalization’ yet its empirical determinants are not well understood. What we do know is based either on poor data for a wide range of nations, or good data for the US and Swedish cases. In this paper, we provide evidence on the determinants of the activities of German multinational firms by using a newly available firm-level data set from the Deutsche Bundesbank. The specific goal of this paper is to demonstrate the relative role of country-level and firm-level determinants of foreign direct investment. We focus on three main questions: First, what are the main driving forces of German firms’ multinational activities? Second, is there evidence that sector-level and firm-level factors shape internationalization patterns? Third, is there evidence of agglomeration effects in the foreign activities of German firms? We find that the market access motive for internationalization dominates. Firms move abroad mainly to gain better access to large foreign markets. Cost-saving motives, however, are important for some manufacturing sectors. Our results strongly suggest that firm-level heterogeneity has an important influence on internationalization patterns – as stressed by recent models of international trade. We also find positive agglomeration effects for the activities of German firms that stem from the number of other German firms that are active on a given foreign market. In terms of lessons for economic policy, our results show that lowering barriers to the integration of markets and encouraging the formation of human capital can promote the activities of multinational firms. However, our results related to the heterogeneity of firms and agglomeration tendencies show that it might be difficult to fine-tune policies directed at the exploitation of synergies and at the creation of clusters of foreign firms.
Read article
